Fri 08 May, 2026: Fauci Files One - Remdesivir Evil - Silent Voices - Solidarity Denied - Faith, Love, Courage - Not Crazy - Buying Time
The Tore Says Show
Tore Says
4.8 • 1K Ratings
🗓️ 8 May 2026
⏱️ 138 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
What happened during Covid wasn't natural. Here's a beginning look at the evil made evident in the Fauci files. The Solidarity experiment. Why didn't we join in? Remdesivir was at the root of the problems. Informed consent is at the very heart of medical ethics. It has been American law for many decades. It's also the humane thing to do. WHO pandemic declarations aside, how was consent isolated and ignored. It was coercion not information. The guilty are now at Satan's mercy, not God's. We'll stick to the law today, not science. The loved ones who died were more than just case numbers. Say their names and defeat the system. Being a citizen historian is never easy. Reliving losses and hanging onto faith, love and courage. Plus, don't forget discernment. Disappearing alternatives were a signal. They took our rights and hid behind bureaucracy. The dismantling must now come from a structural framework. People we trusted walked us down a bad road. Acting on the framework beats just complaining about it. The right to refuse was lost in the shuffle. Grieving people are vulnerable. Remember, discernment is the first stage of resistance.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | I'm going to be. We have a cultural memory of the pandemic that goes something like this. |
| 0:43.4 | When the emergency hit, the rules changed. |
| 0:45.9 | We assume that because hospitals were overwhelmed and a virus was spreading, |
| 0:49.9 | the government suspended our normal right to make our own medical decisions. |
| 0:53.7 | But if you actually look at the law, that did not happen. |
| 0:56.8 | 16 years before COVID even existed, Congress wrote the rules for emergency use authorizations. |
| 1:02.6 | That code is 21 U.S.C. Section 360BB-B-3. |
| 1:08.0 | Looking closely at subsection E of the text, it states that anyone given an unapproved |
| 1:12.8 | emergency use product has the legal right to be informed of the option to accept or refuse |
| 1:18.1 | administration of the product. The government explicitly codified the right to bodily autonomy |
| 1:22.9 | into the law almost two decades ago, even for the most severe public health emergencies. |
| 1:29.2 | Fast forward to May 1, |
| 1:36.0 | 2020. The FDA authorizes the drug remdesivir for emergency use. To comply with that 2004 statute, |
| 1:41.6 | they had to create a mechanism for consent. They produced a two-page document called the patient fact sheet. It translated the legal code into plain English. |
| 1:46.6 | The operative sentence says, it is your choice to receive remdesivir or stop it at any time. |
| 1:53.3 | The only legal way around this requirement is a formal presidential waiver, which is restricted |
| 1:58.9 | exclusively to the armed forces for national security. |
| 2:02.4 | For civilian patients, no waiver was ever signed. The legal floor for patient consent was |
| 2:08.0 | completely intact. It was printed on government letterhead. On paper, the system was designed |
| 2:13.7 | exactly as it should be to protect a patient's choice. Yet families across the country, |
| 2:20.2 | from California to Wisconsin to New York, are now filing wrongful death lawsuits after their |
| 2:25.6 | relatives received rmdesivir. When you read the complaints in these cases, they all share |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tore Says, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Tore Says and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.