Greetings, parish orphans, and retrogrades.

Today is one of the most solemn and important and impactful shows, episodes of Rules for Retrogrades,

that I think I've ever come to you with.

Just five and a half days ago on September the 16th, another letter, more or less posing dubia challenges at the level of the concept,

has been posed by bishops of the Catholic Church to our pontiff Pope Francis.

Since that time in the last five and a half days, I've been contacted by some of the scholars

on the letter who joined the four bishops.

I'll read to you in a second who they are.

And they've asked me, you know, would I join?

The answer is yes.

And in today's episode of Rules for Retrogrades,

I'm going to explain the problem in the Pope's recent,

it was June 29th, Desiderio Deideravi,

the way it was addressed by the bishops five and a half days ago,

and the response from Pope'splainers like where Peter is that's been issued in the last 36 hours.

My contention is the following. As I've been researching this

between that time and now, it's been a busy period. My contention is that one Pete, I'm sorry,

where Peter is, has made the claims of the critics of Pope Francis more or less

charging him with heresy, stick all the more.

In particular, one spot in the Where Peter is article proves, I would say beyond a shadow

of any doubt, that there is the reputed substance, the reputed charge,

which really lies in fact in the case of Francis. So here's the overview, Parish Orphins and Retrogrades.

...