Our indictments speak powerfully in court.

If you don't believe us, just look at the response that the Eastern District of Virginia

under Lindsay Halligan did to James Comey.

And look at the notes and publication of evidence.

That's the type of material we have, but we have to safeguard our prosecutions because

the ultimate accountability is with

the verdict in a jury room.

For once, we agree with Cash Patel.

Hi again, everybody.

It's 5 o'clock now in New York, meaning a strict new deadline just passed moments ago for

the Trump Justice Department, whose indictments, as you just heard, in their view, speak powerfully in court

until they don't. Because this afternoon, in a rare and remarkable ruling, a federal judge in

Virginia ordered the government, the Trump Justice Department, to hand over the grand jury

materials, including audio in the criminal case against former director of the FBI Jim Comey. Now, why did the judge do

that? Well, he explains because there are evidently, quote, genuine issues of misconduct, end quote,

issues apparently so serious that Comey could see his charges dismissed altogether. In his ruling for which

the DOJ sought an emergency stay,

U.S. magistrate judge William Fitzpatrick noted how rare it is to allow a defendant

access to grand jury materials. However, he says, quote, the record points to a disturbing

pattern of profound investigative missteps, missteps that led an FBI agent and a prosecutor

to potentially undermine the integrity of the grand jury proceeding, end quote. Of course, the official

presiding over this, quote, disturbing pattern is the aforementioned interim U.S. attorney Lindsey Halligan,

...