Fixing Democracy: TikTok, Disinformation and Distraction
Past Present Future
D&HR Media Ltd
4.7 • 747 Ratings
🗓️ 19 October 2025
⏱️ 59 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello, my name's David Rumsman and this is past, present, future, the History of Ideas |
| 0:15.0 | podcast. We're coming to the end of our series about how to fix democracy. But before we do, we're talking today |
| 0:22.3 | about a subject that a lot of people have contacted us and asked us to discuss social media, |
| 0:29.2 | information, disinformation, where and how we get our news and what that is doing to our politics. |
| 0:35.9 | I'm talking to the writer Sam Friedman, who has written extensively |
| 0:39.1 | about this subject. We're going to discuss TikTok. We're going to discuss all of the ways in which |
| 0:45.3 | we may be getting the wrong information. And we're going to ask whether democracy can cope |
| 0:51.4 | with the media environment we find ourselves in. |
| 1:00.4 | Sam, I'm going to start with the question, which I suppose is a devil's advocate question. |
| 1:03.8 | I'm not even sure about that because I'm not sure I know what I think about this. |
| 1:12.8 | But why does it matter what the quality of the information that people are getting is? And I ask that for a couple of reasons, one of which is, it's not clear to me in the history of democracy, people have ever had |
| 1:18.3 | good information. And we're talking about news mainly, but not just news, the ways in which people |
| 1:23.6 | are informed about what's going on so that they can make choices. There isn't a golden age, I don't think at any point when the information was good. And then that's a sort of historical point. And then there's a more political sciencey point, which is when there is good information, there's not much evidence that it makes any difference to how people behave politically anyway. And yet, I feel instinctively it must be a problem if the information is getting worse. So why does it matter? |
| 1:46.2 | So I think it's true that there's never been a golden age of sort of incredibly well-educated voters who sort of |
| 1:52.0 | understood all the issues. But the nature of the information people have got has changed |
| 1:58.3 | dramatically insofar as it's become far more fragmented and differentiated |
| 2:04.4 | in the way it operates. So you had a period for most of the 20th century and certainly post-war |
| 2:11.2 | where the news sources, certainly in the UK, but in other countries as well were newspapers, a small number of newspapers, |
| 2:20.4 | and then a small number of television channels, most of which were either state-run |
| 2:25.9 | or had some kind of state-level regulation around the content that attempted to make that |
| 2:33.1 | content broadly neutral and non-partisan, |
| 2:37.0 | not always successfully, but that was the goal. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from D&HR Media Ltd, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of D&HR Media Ltd and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

