meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Past Present Future

Fixing Democracy: TikTok, Disinformation and Distraction

Past Present Future

D&HR Media Ltd

History, Politics, News, Society & Culture, Philosophy

4.7747 Ratings

🗓️ 19 October 2025

⏱️ 59 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In our penultimate episode in this series David talks to writer Sam Freedman about whether democracy can cope with the demands of the social media age. Are we really more vulnerable to disinformation than we have ever been? Is the bigger problem our ever-shrinking attention spans or our ever-divided politics? What happens to democracy as visual communication squeezes out the written word? And what might make things better? Sam Freedman’s Substack is Comment is Freed https://samf.substack.com/ Next time on Fixing Democracy: Confronting the Strongmen Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello, my name's David Rumsman and this is past, present, future, the History of Ideas

0:15.0

podcast. We're coming to the end of our series about how to fix democracy. But before we do, we're talking today

0:22.3

about a subject that a lot of people have contacted us and asked us to discuss social media,

0:29.2

information, disinformation, where and how we get our news and what that is doing to our politics.

0:35.9

I'm talking to the writer Sam Friedman, who has written extensively

0:39.1

about this subject. We're going to discuss TikTok. We're going to discuss all of the ways in which

0:45.3

we may be getting the wrong information. And we're going to ask whether democracy can cope

0:51.4

with the media environment we find ourselves in.

1:00.4

Sam, I'm going to start with the question, which I suppose is a devil's advocate question.

1:03.8

I'm not even sure about that because I'm not sure I know what I think about this.

1:12.8

But why does it matter what the quality of the information that people are getting is? And I ask that for a couple of reasons, one of which is, it's not clear to me in the history of democracy, people have ever had

1:18.3

good information. And we're talking about news mainly, but not just news, the ways in which people

1:23.6

are informed about what's going on so that they can make choices. There isn't a golden age, I don't think at any point when the information was good. And then that's a sort of historical point. And then there's a more political sciencey point, which is when there is good information, there's not much evidence that it makes any difference to how people behave politically anyway. And yet, I feel instinctively it must be a problem if the information is getting worse. So why does it matter?

1:46.2

So I think it's true that there's never been a golden age of sort of incredibly well-educated voters who sort of

1:52.0

understood all the issues. But the nature of the information people have got has changed

1:58.3

dramatically insofar as it's become far more fragmented and differentiated

2:04.4

in the way it operates. So you had a period for most of the 20th century and certainly post-war

2:11.2

where the news sources, certainly in the UK, but in other countries as well were newspapers, a small number of newspapers,

2:20.4

and then a small number of television channels, most of which were either state-run

2:25.9

or had some kind of state-level regulation around the content that attempted to make that

2:33.1

content broadly neutral and non-partisan,

2:37.0

not always successfully, but that was the goal.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from D&HR Media Ltd, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of D&HR Media Ltd and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.