meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Science Quickly

Fitness Bands Fail on Calorie Counts

Science Quickly

Scientific American

Science

4.2639 Ratings

🗓️ 24 May 2017

⏱️ 2 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Activity trackers accurately reckon heart rate—but they're way off in estimates of energy expenditure. Christopher Intagliata reports. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Understanding the human body is a team effort. That's where the Yachtel group comes in.

0:05.8

Researchers at Yachtolt have been delving into the secrets of probiotics for 90 years.

0:11.0

Yacold also partners with nature portfolio to advance gut microbiome science through the global grants for gut health, an investigator-led research program.

0:19.6

To learn more about Yachtolt, visit yawcult.co.

0:22.7

.jp. That's Y-A-K-U-L-T.C-O.J-P. When it comes to a guide for your gut, count on Yacolt.

0:33.5

This is Scientific American's 60-second science. I'm Christopher in Taliatta.

0:39.1

Fitness bands like the Apple Watch and the Fitbit aim to track your vitals, like heart rate,

0:43.8

but early models weren't all that accurate.

0:46.2

We've thought of them a little bit like random number generators. They really didn't seem to be

0:50.1

providing anything that bore any relationship to heart rate.

0:53.1

You and Ashley, a cardiologist who studies wearables at Stanford University.

0:57.6

He and his colleagues have now tested seven newer fitness bands from brands like Apple, Fitbit, and

1:02.8

others, and he says those heart rate stats have gotten way better.

1:06.4

Yeah, we were pleasantly surprised, actually, by how good the accuracy of the heart rate

1:10.7

monitoring was. For most of the accuracy of the heart rate monitoring

1:11.1

was.

1:12.1

For most of the devices, the air rate was less than 5%.

1:15.7

That's good enough for your doctor.

1:17.3

But where all the devices failed to measure up was estimating calories burned.

1:21.7

Even the most accurate devices were off by 27% compared to lab measurements of energy expenditure. One device was off by more than 90%.

1:29.9

If you think about going to the gym and working out for an hour and maybe that's around 400

1:33.5

calories, then in reality, that could be anything from 200 to 800. And that's a big difference.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Scientific American, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Scientific American and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.