meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Political Fix

Final week of the general election, and what Theresa May said to the FT

Political Fix

Financial Times

News, Politics, News & Politics

4.21.2K Ratings

🗓️ 3 June 2017

⏱️ 29 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

With Roula Khalaf, George Parker, Philip Stephens, Jim Pickard and Matt Singh of the Financial Times. Presented by Sebastian PayneRead the full interview with Theresa May on ft.com

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to F.T. Politics, the Financial Times's podcast on all things British politics.

0:09.0

I'm Sebastian Payne and in this week's episode we'll be discussing the final week of the UK general

0:14.8

election campaign and the F.T.'s interview with Theresa May. I'm delighted to be

0:19.8

joined by Philip Stevens, the F.T. Chief Political Commentator, George Parker,

0:24.0

our political editor, Deputy Editor R Rula Halaf, Chief Political Coiswland Jim Picard,

0:28.7

and the F.T. election analyst Matt Singh. Thank you all for joining.

0:32.4

So the general election has

0:34.3

entered its final hall. We've had some TV debate, some surprising polling

0:38.7

momentum, but where exactly is the campaign and is the final outcome in any question.

0:44.0

Matt Singh, let's begin with the state of the pose.

0:48.0

The most striking thing this week has been a new model from U-Gov, big British poster, and they have essentially predicted conservative

0:55.7

losses at this election on just about now giving the Tories a three-four-point lead.

1:00.9

What's going on there and the big question everyone's asking is it true?

1:05.0

Well this model that they've done is essentially a fancy statistical way of taking all of the

1:11.1

information in a large sample of polling data, using it to identify types of voter,

1:15.5

matching it with the census and then effectively modeling how likely everyone in the country

1:20.8

is to vote and who they're likely to vote for. Now the results is

1:25.1

coming out with in terms of seats are actually not that surprising because the

1:29.0

regular polls they're doing they did another one last night they're showing the same sort of

1:33.4

popular vote number sort of three four-point lead so the model itself is the thing

1:37.8

that's got everybody talking but really the interesting bit is the underlying

1:40.4

polling so there is as you say a big difference between

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Financial Times, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Financial Times and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.