3 million pages of evidence, thousands of unsealed flight logs,

millions of data points, names, themes and timelines connected.

You are listening to the Epstein files, the world's first AI-native investigation into the case that traditional journalism simply could not handle.

Welcome to the Epstein Files.

Last time we examined Ehud Barak's documented financial relationship with Epstein millions through

connected trusts, reputed visits to the Manhattan Mansion, and an Israel that is not

open a single investigation.

Today we are looking at two American political figures, former Governor Bill Richardson, and

former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell, whose names appear independently across multiple

victim depositions and asking why neither man was ever formally investigated as part of our

ongoing investigation. As always, every document and source we reference is available at

Epsteinfiles.fm. So let's start with the document. The New York Times report on George

Mitchell facing Epstein Files' fallout.

I'm looking at the specific reference to Epstein's birthday book containing a letter believed to be signed by Mitchell.

Right. And we really need to contextualize exactly what that documentation means before we look at the sworn testimony.

We are analyzing records released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act or EFA, because these are not, you know, internet rumors.

These are legal documents, flight logs, message slips, sworn depositions that were generated within the justice system.

We are tracing the exact pathways of two highly insulated political figures through Jeffrey Epstein and Gisling Maxwell's operation.

Imagine someone accuses you publicly and under oath of a horrific crime.

Your first instinct, I mean, your absolute immediate reflex, would be to sue them into oblivion, right?

Yeah, absolutely.

You would want to clear your name, drag them into court, force them to prove it. Yeah. But what happens when Titans of American politics are accused of

...