meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
FLF, LLC

Fifth Commandment Problems: “Christian” Legal Arguments That Conform to the World [God, Law, and Liberty]

FLF, LLC

FLF, LLC

News

4.7957 Ratings

🗓️ 1 November 2024

⏱️ 30 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Is it a “legal strategy” or a Fifth Commandment problem when Christian legal advocates eschew common law and its application to current legal issues involving human sexuality? David uses an amicus brief recently filed by a leading Christian legal advocacy organization with the U.S. Supreme Court and William Blackstone to answer that question and shows how its rights-based legal argument conforms to the way the ungodly think about rights.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Thank you for joining us for another episode of God, Law, and Liberty with David Fowler,

0:08.3

President of the Family Action Council of Tennessee.

0:11.5

Every week, we are putting culture, politics, and law on a collision course with the truth of God's Word.

0:18.0

And now, here's David.

0:23.2

Well, I'm glad you've joined me for today's episode of God, Law, and Liberty. And I want to say

0:29.6

up front, if I do a good job with what I present today, let me encourage you then to share this episode with your

0:41.3

friends. And the reason I say that is not because I think I'm brilliant, but my heart is so

0:48.6

heavy from continuing to think about what I have read in the briefs submitted on behalf of Christian

0:59.6

organizations and Christian legal organizations in the case, pending before the United States

1:07.0

Supreme Court over Tennessee's law prohibiting medical interventions to treat a minor's

1:15.6

gender dysphoria.

1:18.6

And I touched on that last two weeks, one with the brief filed by the Ethics and Public Policy Commission that argued essentially

1:30.6

natural law citing Cicero and Plato and those guys.

1:35.9

And then last week I spoke about the brief submitted by my friends at Alliance defending

1:41.1

freedom and in particular the meme touting their brief that argued,

1:47.8

they asserted that the state has a right to prohibit these treatments.

1:54.3

And in particular with respect to that brief, that I agree, I think they have a right to do that.

2:00.4

I pointed out that the brief that I filed, and I think, is to be honest, the Christian argument

2:07.7

is that states have a duty to prevent the intentional sterilization of a minor child at the hands of a doctor,

2:20.6

even with the permission of a parent.

2:24.4

Because there are certain things that are fundamentally true about what it means to be human,

2:31.2

that no person, no doctor, no parent, and no state can countenance.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from FLF, LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of FLF, LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.