Felony-Adjacent

Divided Argument

Will Baude & Dan Epps

Constitution, Constitutional Law, News, Law, Politics, Supreme Court, Government, Legal System, Supreme Court Of The United States, U.s. Supreme Court, Scotus, Supreme Court Justice

4.9 • 676 Ratings

🗓️ 26 June 2024

⏱️ 68 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

We cut to the chase with extended discussions of two of last week's cases: United States v. Rahimi, which upheld a federal gun law against Second Amendment challenge and produced six concurring and dissenting opinions; and Erlinger v. United States, a case about the jury's role in sentencing that continues a line of cases starting 25 years ago in Apprendi v. New Jersey.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Oh, yay, oh, yay, oh, yay, oh, yay.
0:03.3	The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court.
0:08.0	Unless there is any more question to be able to find an argument in this case.
0:11.0	All persons having business before the Honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States are in honorous to give their attention.
0:19.4	Welcome to Divided Argument, an unscheduled, unpredictable,
0:22.7	Supreme Court podcast. I'm Dan Apps.
0:24.9	And I'm well bud.
0:26.2	So we're going to try something new today, Will, which is...
0:30.2	Unpredictable.
0:31.0	Yeah, who could have predicted this, that we're not going to spend 45 minutes
0:35.5	debating every latest news story about Supreme Court ethics.
0:41.5	Good.
0:41.6	Actually, maybe just talk about cases and maybe if we get to that stuff later, check it out.
0:45.2	The only thing I will say about it is there's been some pushback by Mark Paletta in the
0:50.5	Wall Street Journal about the way in which fix the court, added, tallied up the different
0:54.7	justices gifts. I haven't dug deep into it enough to know who's right here, but just
0:59.8	putting that on the table for people that are skeptics. All right. Where should we start?
1:04.9	Do you say anything about what's happened at the court? Just, you know, give people an overview
1:09.2	since last time we were out there.
1:11.9	So we've had nine more decisions since we last posted, recorded, four on Thursday,
1:19.4	five on Friday, Diaz versus United States, Chavarini versus City of Napoleon,
1:25.0	Moore versus United States, Gonzalez versus Trevino, a precurium.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Will Baude & Dan Epps, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Will Baude & Dan Epps and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.