B-Pod Studios And now, I'm just trying to spell it out for the list. Felger and Mazz. S-T-O-O-P-I-D. T-E-P-I-D. P-O-B, boom. Isn't that, Bob? Felger and Mazz. Q-U-U-I-T-Q-Q. Okay, thank thank you. No, spell up for me too. I'm an idiot. 985, the Sports Hub. Stidham really reminds me as a player, Mike. My comparison to him was Tony Romo. I thought he was a stronger-armed Tony Romo when I watched him at Auburn. I'm not surprised to hear the praise for him.

You know, I've been hearing it, and I saw it on film when I watched him and evaluate him coming on the draft.

I think he's got a chance to be a long time starting quarterback in the NFL.

Again, Chris Sims, high on Jared Stittam. I consider that high praise to say guys, Tony Romo.

But a lot of you, I think what this comes down to in Murray, I'm looking at you, baby, virtually.

You got to get realistic.

Like, just because a guy's not Tom Brady, it doesn't mean everybody sucks, you know,

and the next guy's not going to be Tom Brady.

And the next guy is going to have some problems.

And the next guy, you're not going to like this, that, or the other.

I mean, you just, not every guy is Tom Brady.

So, like, if you have a guy with talent that, the whole point of keeping Bill and letting

Brady go is that Bill works with the next guy and develops the next guy.

So if you have a guy with skill and talent and Bill can coach the faults out of him, like that's the idea.

So if your next guy is Tony Romo or you think, you know, again, if you're one of these guys, I think James Winston can be that guy or Cam Newton newton still has something left then oh my god take it and run murray take it and run yeah well i don't think as highly of belichick as you do then again i don't get the invites on the boat so i can understand where you're coming from and why you're biased there and if someone used the comp of joe flacco i could live with that. I know the next guy's not going to be Brady. No one's going to be Brady.

But if I heard Flacco, and he obviously has his fault, I'd be okay with that because at least Flacco caught fire and won a Super Bowl and was the Super Bowl MVP. Romo, while talented. Hold on. Hold on. Hold on. You'd rather have Joe Flacco than Tony Romo? Yep. Oh, stop it.

Yep.

Had balls.

He had balls, unlike Romo, who was an inherent loser.

And now this generation's Romo, Jimmy Garapolo, I want no part of either. So those guys have the inherent gutlessness. I don't care if you're Belichick or God, you're not going to beat it out of them. So it depends on the comp. That's why I get my backup about Romo. You'll win 10 or 11 games. You'll still be

competitive. You'll get primetime games. All that's neat. You'll never win a title with Tony Romo. Murray, it's situational. Some of it's situational. Romo had some problems early in his career in big games. He was fine at the end. And if you look at it, I saw him lose plenty of playoff games that he had no nothing to do with that game in green bay that they lost the remember the the the play where

des bryant was saw him lose plenty of playoff games that he had no nothing to do with that game in green

...