Tanya Chutkin has finally issued her scheduling order after the hearing that happened today to discuss the Supreme Court's immunity decision and how it's going to impact the Smith, the Jack Smith case against Donald Trump, the Washington, D.C. case.

So that came out hours after the scheduling hearing that happened this morning and

the arraignment on the superseding indictment. So let's just recap what

happened today and then I'll tell you what she ruled because she did not rule from the bench.

She hours later, she instead thought about it and then issued a two-page

scheduling order so just to recap what happened today Jack Smith as, as you know, filed a superseding indictment

in the January 6 case and took out, really

slimmed down by about nine or 10 pages,

and took out any reference to anything in the big

sweeping indictment that is he that president former president Trump is now

immune from prosecution based on the big immunity decision that the Supreme Court issued July 1st, 2024 holding for the first time ever in the history of this country that

presidents are essentially kings.

So they didn't hold that. That's what one of the dissenters said.

But that essentially that Donald Trump is immune from prosecution and for things that when he's doing his job essentially things at acting as president he's absolutely immune for anything that is core presidential,

within his core presidential duties and they said examples of that are when he is

dealing with his Department of Justice. So for example,

Jacksmith had to take out of his indictment

any reference to the Department of Justice

and Trump's efforts to use the Department of Justice

to sow seeds of doubt as if there was some kind of election

fraud even though he was told over and over again that there was not.

Then there's a second category where he's presumptively immune, meaning we're going to presume

...