meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Federal Criminal Justice Reform Focus Shifts to 2017

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 4 October 2016

⏱️ 5 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Time has effectively run out on federal criminal justice reform in 2016. So says Greg Newburn of Families Against Mandatory Minimums.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Tuesday, October 4, 2016. I'm Caleb Brown.

0:06.0

There were high hopes for some kind of sentencing reform on Capitol Hill this year.

0:10.0

Those hopes included reduction or elimination of many mandatory

0:14.1

minimums and the addition of a default so-called mens rea requirement. Advocates for

0:19.5

sentencing reform like Greg Newburn of families against mandatory minimums say their focus is now

0:24.7

shifting to reform efforts in 2017.

0:28.4

Sentencing reform essentially died on Capitol Hill.

0:32.0

What does that actually mean?

0:33.5

Well, it means that no bill will pass this year.

0:36.7

But it doesn't necessarily mean that no bill will not pass ever.

0:41.3

The Congress has basically said that the time has run out for the criminal justice

0:47.4

package that was pending in both the House and the Senate.

0:49.9

So we don't expect either chamber to bring it up for a vote this year.

0:55.0

So it is effectively dead at the federal level this year.

0:57.9

And what was on the table, the particular piece of legislation that was on the table was the less robust version of sentencing reform that had been offered.

1:10.0

Several types of sentencing reform have been offered through the years.

1:14.8

We had the Smarter Sentencing Act from Senator Cruz.

1:18.7

We had the Justice Safety Valve Act from Senator Paul.

1:23.0

We had Representative Sensenbrenner's Safe Justice Act.

1:26.9

And then now this one, of course, which was a compromise

1:30.2

that was hammered out aggressive and less comprehensive than

1:39.3

some of the previous ones which tends to happen when you're when you're writing legislation and you're going

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.