Special Counsel Jack Smith just responded to Donald Trump's supplemental request to try to dismiss the

moralago document case on the basis of a concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the overall Supreme Court decision which granted Donald Trump absolute presidential immunity.

In the absolute immunity ruling,

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a single author justice concurrence,

meaning just Clarence Thomas wrote it, none of the other justices where Clarence

Thomas said, you know what, in addition to absolute immunity for core constitutional functions,

official acts which we should give broad presumptions

at everything a president does is an official act, and also the inadmissibility of any evidence

relating to official acts. I want to go a step further.

And Justice Clarence Thomas, who we all know is on the take now, who's been bribed more than

four million dollars in clear and present view said you know what I want I think

that the special counsel in general is unconstitutional and Judge Eileen

Cannon he didn't say her name specifically, but he goes,

any case involving the special counsel's office,

those cases should be dismissed too, wink, wink, wink.

And as we reported then, Justice Clarence Thomas was quite literally sending a message

to Judge Eileen Cannon, the judge who Donald Trump appointed after he had lost and telling her what to do to try to get the

Maralago document case dismissed.

Now before Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that concurring opinion, there were multiple days of hearings that were held by Judge Eileen Cannon for which she has failed to rule yet because as we know she issues paperless order

paperless order paperless order and never makes a ruling but the very fact that

she entertained Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the indictment in the Maralago document case on the basis that the special counsel was unlawfully appointed that the special counsel is unconstitutional and that the funds appropriated to the special

counsel are unlawful.

...