Michael Popoc, Legal AF, Vice President Kamala Harris, and the Senate Democrats are leaving no stone

unturned in their attempt to reverse the decision by the United States Supreme Court to grant

absolute immunity or immunity with a presumptive immunity for anyone who occupies

the Oval Office for criminal conduct. That's the result of the July 1st decision by the United States Supreme Court in Trump versus the US,

which effectively gave anyone who occupies that office, including somebody named Donald Trump.

Immunity, different levels of immunity, we'll talk about on this hot take, but immunity for criminal

conduct while he happened to also be president of the United States, except in some narrow categories

of obvious, we hope, private conduct having nothing to do with the office.

Chuck Schumer, Senate Majority Leader for the Democrats, and supported by Kamala Harris as part of

her platform, if you will, for becoming elected president of the United States,

supports the No Kings Act. It's what it sounds like. We don't have kings in this country.

We are a law in a society of law, not men. We are a society where no one is above

the law. We say that. Everybody gives lip service to it, including Chief Justice Roberts and

his decision back in July in one line, but you

got to walk the walk and talk the talk. And that's what Chuck Schumer's doing. He's going to put

it up for Senate debate to see who's against voting for a king.

In other words, anyone that votes for something called the No Kings Act and votes, I vote no

on the No Kings Act. I like Kings. You like people above the law? And what it's going to do is address

certain observations that are now law in the 6-3 decision by the United States Supreme Court in July in which

establish this for the first time ever immunity from criminal prosecution of

a president former or current occupant.

And what it says is, yes, no person is above the law.

...