meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

FDIC Sets Bad Precedent in SVB Failure

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 15 March 2023

⏱️ 13 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Shareholders are getting hosed by the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, but depositors ought to be more on the hook for losses than, say, depositors at other banks. Norbert Michel discusses the bad precedent set by the FDIC.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Wednesday, March 15th,

0:05.9

2003. I'm Caleb Brown. The failure of Silicon Valley Bank spurred the

0:10.6

FDIC and Federal Reserve to action.

0:13.0

So is it a bailout?

0:15.0

Cato's Norbert Michelle says, you bet it is.

0:17.0

Depositors will be made whole by FDIC.

0:20.0

That means imposing costs on other banks

0:22.0

and quite likely their customers and depositors.

0:25.1

We spoke yesterday. Silicon Valley banks shareholders are going to be wiped out.

0:31.1

Is that right?

0:32.3

Looks that way.

0:34.0

Okay, so one of the questions I hear from social media and I didn't have a really good answer to it immediately is,

0:41.0

well, how do you call this a bailout if all the shareholders get

0:43.5

wiped out? Well there's there are different degrees of bailouts and this is it's true that they're

0:50.6

not bailing out those shareholders for those shares if it goes that way.

0:55.5

But that doesn't mean that there's no bailout here. You had uninsured depositors who are being made whole.

1:02.3

Some of those are probably shareholders as well. I don't know.

1:06.3

Irrelevant though because you've got uninsured depositors being made hold. By definition that's a bailout and to say that because

1:16.9

the shareholders aren't being bailed out in this particular instance it's not a

1:20.4

bailout is much too narrow of a view. What you've got now too is this systemic

1:25.8

designation where all uninsured depositors are being told, hey don't worry about it, we

1:30.8

got you covered. We be in the federal government and what that means is that any

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.