meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Legal AF by MeidasTouch

Fani Willis Gets Ready to DROP THE HAMMER on Trump Co-Defendant

Legal AF by MeidasTouch

Meidas Media Network

News Commentary, News

4.96.1K Ratings

🗓️ 25 August 2023

⏱️ 15 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Legal AF Host Karen Friedman Agnifilo breaksdown what will happen at Mark Meadow’s mini-trial in Federal Court Monday where he will try and get his case removed from State Court. Fani Willis has subpoenaed Brad Raffensperger and one other to testify. Go to https://PrizePicks.com/legalaf and use code legalaf for a first deposit match up to $100! Visit https://meidastouch.com for more!" Remember to subscribe to ALL the Meidas Media Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://pod.link/1510240831 Legal AF: https://pod.link/1580828595 The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://pod.link/1595408601 The Influence Continuum: https://pod.link/1603773245 Kremlin File: https://pod.link/1575837599 Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://pod.link/1530639447 The Weekend Show: https://pod.link/1612691018 The Tony Michaels Podcast: https://pod.link/1561049560 American Psyop: https://pod.link/1652143101 Burn the Boats: https://pod.link/1485464343 Majority 54: https://pod.link/1309354521 Political Beatdown: https://pod.link/1669634407 Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://pod.link/1676844320 MAGA Uncovered: https://pod.link/1690214260 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Rathensberger and Georgia Election Investigator Francis Watson

0:06.5

has been subpoenaed by Fannie Willis to testify on Monday at what people are deeming a mini trial

0:13.5

that's going to take place in Georgia federal court in front of federal judge, district judge

0:20.4

Jones. What is this about and what is going on? In some ways, this is going to be a preview

0:28.4

of some of the evidence that Fannie Willis has in her blockbuster Georgia case against 19

0:35.5

defendants and why are we in federal court on Monday and what's happening? So three of the 19

0:42.1

defendants have asked that their case be removed to federal court. What does that mean? What is

0:50.0

federal removal? There's a statute that dictates when civil and criminal cases get sent to or

0:59.2

removed to federal court, essentially saying that state court is not the appropriate place for

1:04.9

the cases to be tried. Now for a criminal case, which is what we have here, we have a 19 count

1:11.8

RICO indictment. What the defendants have to allege in federal court is that number one,

1:19.1

they were a federal officer. Number two, that they were acting under the authority of their job.

1:24.8

So they were basically doing their job at the time and acting under their authority of their job.

1:30.8

They call it the color, under the color of the authority of their position of a federal officer.

1:36.4

And number three, that there's a plausible federal defense. So that is what they are alleging.

1:42.3

And Mark Meadows has indicated that he wants to remove his case to federal court and he has

1:52.0

alleged those three things. He has, however, in some ways really hurt his case because in addition to

2:01.6

asking for this removal to federal court, what he said in his motion was very much that he was doing

2:10.5

his job, that this was part of his job. He essentially made admissions that he was making the phone calls,

2:17.2

arranging the meetings and doing all the things that he's alleged to be doing. And he's saying,

2:23.2

well, what do you think the job of chief of staff is? But one thing he's not thinking about for some

2:29.2

perplexing reason is that the chief of staff is allowed to work for and do these things for the

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Meidas Media Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Meidas Media Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.