False Accusation, Social Media Self-Harm, Attachment Parenting, and Nocebo
Psychology In Seattle Podcast
Kirk Honda
4.5 • 1.3K Ratings
🗓️ 10 May 2023
⏱️ 68 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Get started with EveryPlate for just $1.49 per meal by going to www.everyplate.com/podcast and enter the code seattle149.
From our sponsor, BetterHelp: Need a therapist? Try BetterHelp! https://www.betterhelp.com/kirkGet started today and enjoy 10% off your first month. Discount code “KIRK" will be automatically applied.
00:00 Duty to warn circumstances
08:32 Peer influence of self-harm
15:22 Finding attachment security
22:41 Parentified in adulthood
24:04 Distorting avoidance
38:43 OPP
40:20 Explaining attachment theory to others
48:40 Nocebo-ing listeners & treating attachment injuries
Become a patron: https://www.patreon.com/PsychologyInSeattle
Email: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/contact
Website: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com
Merch: https://teespring.com/stores/psychology-in-seattle
Cameo: https://www.cameo.com/kirkhonda
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/psychologyinseattle/
Facebook Official Page: https://www.facebook.com/PsychologyInSeattle/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@kirk.honda
May 10, 2023
The Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®
Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being.
Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although, we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hey, these are my listeners. I thought I would answer patron emails. So let's get to it. |
| 0:04.3 | This email is from patron Matt from Minneapolis. He says, hey, Kirk, I just finished listening to |
| 0:09.6 | your duty to warn deep dive and found it fascinating and very informative. I was wondering if |
| 0:16.0 | duty to warn and protect standards could be applied if a patient uttered and showed serious intent |
| 0:21.6 | to falsely accuse, falsely accuse their partner of a crime, physical or sexual abuse, for example, |
| 0:28.1 | that they didn't commit. Do you think this hypothetical would be the standards end of email? |
| 0:33.6 | Yeah, so for the listeners, if you want to listen to my ethical deep dives on duty to warn, |
| 0:39.5 | duty to to protect, I will listen to those episodes. It's pretty complicated. It depends on |
| 0:43.6 | jurisdiction and on case law. And there's a lot of uncertainty because these things aren't clearly |
| 0:49.4 | delineated for us as clinicians. But to contemplate your question by first reaction is no. If I had a |
| 0:58.1 | client tell me that they had a plan to accuse their, you know, say it's a husband and he plans on |
| 1:06.2 | falsely, he knows that he's going to lie to the authorities and say that his wife physically abused |
| 1:11.6 | him. He's going to call the police like they're going through a divorce. That's a custody case or |
| 1:16.0 | something like that. And he's planning on doing that. Would I consider that to be a duty to |
| 1:21.1 | protect issue? No, because it doesn't alert me to some seriously, serious bodily harm, right? |
| 1:28.8 | It's a serious issue. And of course, I would talk with the client a lot about how they shouldn't be |
| 1:34.8 | doing that. I mean, even if the client isn't necessarily asking me for that kind of feedback, |
| 1:41.0 | that's just a moral issue that as a human being, you know, never mind that I'm a therapist in that |
| 1:46.4 | moment. As a human being, I'm not going to just stand by and watch someone do that. Now, |
| 1:51.1 | let's say you have a scenario where the husband has convincingly told me maybe even I have |
| 1:57.0 | corroborating evidence and reports stating that the wife is massively abusive to the kids. |
| 2:04.7 | But has gotten off. Scott free. And so the husband has to lie to get custody of the kids or so. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Kirk Honda, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Kirk Honda and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.