Faith Stowers VPR Lawsuit - Part 1
The Bravo Docket
The Docket, LLC
4.8 • 2.3K Ratings
🗓️ 10 April 2024
⏱️ 28 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
In this episode we go through some of the background and details of the facts alleged in the Faith Stowers Vanderpump Rules lawsuit. We had to stop early due to our schedules and Texas weather, so we will get the second part out for you as soon as possible with a discussion of the legal claims, what we know from a potentially very similar contract to the one Faith discusses in her lawsuit, and more. We will be back to finish up our scheduled Marco Marco episodes next.
Access additional content and our Patreon here: https://zez.am/thebravodocket
The Bravo Docket podcast, the statements we make whether in our own media or elsewhere, and any content we post are for entertainment purposes only and do not provide legal advice. Any party consuming our information should consult a lawyer for legal advice. The podcast, our opinions, and our posts, are our own and are not associated with our employers, Bravo TV, or any other television network. Cesie is admitted to the State Bar of New York. Angela is admitted to the State Bars of Texas, Kansas, and Missouri.
Become a member at https://plus.acast.com/s/thebravodocket.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | In reality television, the people are represented by two separate but equally obsessed attorneys. |
| 0:06.2 | This is their podcast. Hi, I'm Sussi. And I'm Angela. And this is the Bravo docket. |
| 0:27.0 | Hey everyone, welcome back to the Bravo docket. We're going to do a quick little interim episode in between our Marco Marko coverage |
| 0:32.0 | to give you guys some content this week. We're going to be talking about the lawsuit that faith filed against Bravo. |
| 0:39.0 | Yeah, and it's Faith Stowers from Vanderbilt Rules. I think the last time she appeared on the show was something like what 2018 maybe? |
| 0:47.2 | I think 2018 I mean interestingly enough she's being represented by the same Bethany-Frankle reality reckoning attorneys, |
| 0:58.6 | the same Rachel Levis attorneys, the same Brandy Galanville attorneys. So I think we just add this to the reality |
| 1:07.1 | reckoning litigations. |
| 1:09.1 | Yep, they even, in one of the paragraphs of this complaint even mentioned that it's been spearheaded by Bethany Frankel. |
| 1:16.6 | So they went ahead and just put that in a paragraph of the complaint. |
| 1:20.0 | They're like, screw it, we're not hiding it. |
| 1:21.6 | Yep. This is what it is. |
| 1:23.6 | So how do you want to start? |
| 1:24.6 | Do you want to start by going through the complaint? |
| 1:26.6 | We're going to go through the complaint and then discuss it a little bit. |
| 1:29.0 | We've talked a little bit before about some of the contracts and then some of these other types of, I guess we're |
| 1:36.3 | calling them the reality reckoning complaints. |
| 1:39.3 | So we'll go through the allegations and kind of give our commentary on them the way we did with for |
| 1:45.1 | example Caroline Manzo's complaint and then we have some bonus content at the |
| 1:49.9 | end we do have a limited appearance contract that looks like it might be pretty similar to one of the |
| 1:57.2 | contracts faith mentioned. It's a different production company but it's signed around the same time and it looks from the way she's describing the language in this |
| 2:04.6 | complaint like it could be pretty similar. There's also a order from a federal court in |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Docket, LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Docket, LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.