meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Divided Argument

Faith in Princes

Divided Argument

Will Baude & Dan Epps

Constitution, Constitutional Law, News, Law, Politics, Supreme Court, Government, Legal System, Supreme Court Of The United States, U.s. Supreme Court, Scotus, Supreme Court Justice

4.9676 Ratings

🗓️ 23 May 2021

⏱️ 56 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Will and Dan ponder what this podcast is about, continue their discussion of good faith in judging, try to game out exactly what the Court is up to in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, and respond to listener feedback.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Oh, yay.

0:02.0

Oh, yay.

0:03.1

The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court.

0:08.0

Unless there is any more question to be able to find an argument in this case.

0:10.8

All persons having business before the Honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States, are admonished to give their attention.

0:19.2

Welcome to Divided Argument, an unscheduled, unpredictable,

0:22.8

Supreme Court podcast. I'm Dan Epps.

0:25.7

And I'm Will Bode. It's been quite a week, hasn't it?

0:28.4

Yeah, we've really been cranking the episodes out, despite the court only giving us,

0:33.4

you know, a few opinions to work with. So we've had a bunch of non-opinion-related episodes.

0:36.9

And I think we're going to do another one right now just to continue filling the airwaves with content while we wait for even more work product from the court.

0:46.6

Yeah, I was afraid somebody might have actually gotten caught up.

0:48.9

So we need to try to stay ahead of our listeners.

0:51.1

Yeah.

0:51.5

It's kind of a shock and awe kind of approach for now before we

0:54.8

run out of steam and need to take a little bit of a breather, as I'm sure we will. But this is,

0:59.6

this is the privilege of being an unscheduled podcast. You can do four or five episodes in a week.

1:05.6

You can do no episodes in a week and nobody gets to complain about it. I think they will complain

1:10.2

then. Well, they can complain to

1:11.6

someone else, not to me. So I thought maybe it might be good for us just to take a little bit of a

1:16.5

step back and sort of try to figure out what we're doing here because we've gotten some,

1:20.4

some questions about that. So what's the idea behind the show? Because we didn't really,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Will Baude & Dan Epps, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Will Baude & Dan Epps and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.