Facts vs Opinions
TALKING POLITICS
Catherine Carr
4.7 • 2.5K Ratings
🗓️ 4 June 2020
⏱️ 46 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
David and Helen talk with Jonathan Shainin, Head of Opinion at the Guardian newspaper, about the challenges of political journalism in a deeply polarised age. Is it possible to hold the line between news and comment? Are the arguments about Covid a rerun of Brexit? What can scientists and historians add to political analysis? Plus we discuss how American journalism has changed the way it talks about race and violence and what that means for the current moment.
Talking Points:
The heightened state of political opinion writing around Brexit seems to have dissipated.
- The opinion pages became a vehicle for a kind of tribal politics. There was a relentless urgency to it: was that illusory?
- Technology revealed the enormous appetite for news and commentary related to Brexit.
- People want updates and then they want trusted voices to add to the experience and understanding of events.
Is there a distinction between emotional and analytical opinion pieces?
- Opinion pages will always reflect partisan opinions.
- To what extent is an opinion piece feeding into a libidinal appetite among readers?
- Is there a role in either the Guardian or the Telegraph for an opinion piece that would be comprehensible to the other side?
One thing John set out to do is to reduce the frequency of opinion pieces.
- In the early days of the pandemic, a lot of the pieces were explanatory and written by experts.
- Can we separate scientific expertise from political judgment?
Analytical pieces aim for a different kind of persuasion.
- Historians and political theorists can say: can we think about things in a different way?
- No form of journalism can be made bulletproof against weaponised forms of skepticism or cynicism.
The classical model of how the facts, the news, and the demos interact is now outdated.
- A new model would have to capture the chaos and instability between these elements.
- Journalism feels more urgent, yet the urgency is accompanied by diminished authority.
- Has Trump revealed the limits of the analytical mode?
- What happens when there isn’t room for reasonable disagreement?
Mentioned in this Episode:
- Ian Jack on the Scottish Independence Referendum
- David’s piece for The Guardian, It was all a dream’
- William Hanage for the Guardian on COVID
- Melanie Philips in the Times on COVID
- Alan Finlayson on why we should stop complaining about tribalism
- Helen’s piece on football for the New Statesman
- David on climate denialism
Further Learning:
- David and...
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello, my name is David Ronsman and this is Talking Politics. Today, Helen and I are |
| 0:09.9 | talking with Jonathan Shayn in who is head of opinion for the Guardian newspaper. We're |
| 0:14.8 | talking about political opinion and political fact in a deeply polarized world. |
| 0:23.5 | Talking Politics is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books, Europe's |
| 0:27.7 | leading magazine of culture and ideas. Improve the quality of your solitude with a subscription |
| 0:34.2 | to the LRB. They'll send you exceptional analysis of the politics, economics, sociology |
| 0:41.3 | and science behind the crisis and reportage from around the world. But also, gloriously |
| 0:48.0 | unrelated, richly immersive distraction from the world's best authors and critics, writing |
| 0:53.5 | about history and philosophy, art and technology, fiction and poetry. Just go to lrb.me-torg |
| 1:02.7 | and get your first 12 issues for just 12 pounds. That's lrb.me-torg. |
| 1:13.8 | So Helen, as usual, is in London. I'm in Cambridge. Hi Jonathan, you're in Stephen Edge, |
| 1:18.2 | right? Just outside Stephen Edge, yes. We're allowed to say that, that's public knowledge. |
| 1:23.8 | Yes, I have no secrets. There's a lot we could cover here and we're going to talk about |
| 1:28.9 | some big themes to do with what political opinion means in the kind of new cycles that we're |
| 1:34.1 | living through now. But we should try and frame it through some of the big controversies |
| 1:38.5 | that we've all been living through. And before we come on to COVID and before we come |
| 1:42.0 | on to what's happening in the United States at the moment, maybe we could start with Brexit. |
| 1:47.0 | So you were at the Guardian, you've been at the Guardian through the Brexit years. You edited |
| 1:51.5 | Guardian Longreads before you became head of opinion altogether. So now you cover the |
| 1:56.5 | shorter term opinion cycle as well. There's this difficulty in knowing how to think about |
| 2:01.7 | all of that frenetic opinion, some of which you will have commissioned during the Brexit |
| 2:06.7 | years that kind of fizzled out that the heightened state of political opinion and political opinion |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Catherine Carr, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Catherine Carr and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

