Clearly, one of the things we learned is that in an unjust and difficult reality, you should

not expect people to have joy, as they put in Harris's electoral campaign. They need to know

who it is that is to blame and who is an accurate target for their aggression. There's

nothing wrong with aggression and a desire to strike back when you're suffering injustice.

And this is something that Donald Trump offers, right?

He seems pissed off.

He's angry.

He points to enemies.

He expresses frustration, annoyance.

And, I mean, the contrast with Kamala Harris is extraordinary in that regard.

I will be your revenge.

That was his thing in spring.

And, yeah, I mean, Harris, there's nothing about her that would excite you.

So, you know, you get these simulated transient experiences, kind of emotional contagions like Brat Girl Summer, which has nothing to do with real joy at all.

Has everything to do with a kind of nervous end-of-the-world jitteriness, which comes out of

laughter and standing. So you need to have an enemy, obviously. You need to correctly identify

the enemy, and you need to offer people an alternative to revenge.

Second, just in terms of the program, it seems obvious to me that in addition to material relief

that people obviously need, the Sanders campaign, I was reminded recently. It was talking about

all these material interests, sure. It was talking about healthcare.

It was talking about wages.

It was talking about poverty employers.

...