So, guys, Derek, well, place more than age.com.

Today we're going to be talking about the amount of muscle growth at 100 milligrams of a

diana ball showed to produce in a clinical model.

So this is the effects of diana ball on performance and body composition of men undergoing athletic training.

So there was, this is a study from the 80s. So

keep that in mind here. But a lot of these studies we refer to for this stuff is stuff we have to

take from the 70s, the 80s, even the 60s in some cases, just because this shit is not really

evaluated in current day very much. This was something that was really, you know, owned in on

in the pre-steroid clampdown and we get a lot of good data from, you know, back in the day

when we delve into this stuff back in the 80s and the 70s and whatnot. And it gives us

a better reference point for extrapolating for current research i suppose because some

of this stuff you're just not going to find in more recent publications so you've got to dig pretty

deep and you'll find stuff like this so in a previous study the first one of the first studies on

diana ball they looked at what kind of effect it had on muscle growth and they gained weight

with increases in total body potassium and muscle dimensions but it was not really assessed how much of this muscle weight

was water weight or actual contractile tissue so that was what this study intended to kind of

elucidate is how much the muscle gain or the size gain from

dianable, I should say, is actual contractile tissue relative to fluff weight. So, which is

interesting because a lot of these studies when you'll see on anabolic steroids is just like,

oh, 600 milligrams of testosterone produced a lean body mass gain or a you know a fat-free mass gain

of X number of pounds but it's like it doesn't actually do like a differentiation between

how much of that was water and how much of that was actual permanent contractile tissue so this

...