Something else was just set free in Canada actually in 2015 but it has now

slid down the slippery slope to something that I think everyone really needs

to understand here. So how this started in 2015 there was a Supreme Court case

in Canada, Carter versus Canada. So it was a woman with a fatal neurogenitive

disease and she wanted to have physicians assisted suicide and at that time if

a doctor were to offer that that would be homicides. The doctor would be charged

with homicide under that current Canadian law. So in the court documents it says

this, the trial judge found that the prohibition against physician assisted

dying violates the S7 rights of competent adults who are suffering intolerably

as a result of a grievous and irremediable medical condition and concluded

that this infringement is not justified under S1 of the charter. It goes on to say

an absolute prohibition on physicians assisted dying is rashly connected to the

goal of protecting the vulnerable from taking their life in times of weakness

because prohibiting an activity that poses certain risks is a rational method

of curtailing the risk. However, as the trial judge found the evidence does not

support the contention that a blanket prohibition is necessary in order to

substantially meet the government's objective. So they're basically saying we

don't have to have this blanket prohibition anymore. So they instructed the

government to go back and figure out a way to not have this blanket prohibition.

So the Judo government went back and this was the headline just a year later

out of New York Times. The Canadian Prime Minister seeks to legalize assisted

suicide in Canada. This is called Bill C-14 and the parameters of that bill

...