All right, Alexander, let's revisit the topic of Russian frozen assets.

And Ursula von der Leyen, she sent a letter to all of the heads of states of EU countries.

And she basically gave them three options.

Option number one is for them to pay Ukraine so they can keep the Ukraine government

to float over the next two years. So either they reach in their pockets. That's one option.

Reach into your pocket and give money to Ukraine straight up. Option number two is some sort

of collective debt, a collective loan together as EU member states. They go in on a loan.

They guarantee it. And then that money goes to Ukraine. And option number three is taking the Russian

frozen assets, which is the option that Ursula prefers. Yes. So those are the three options she presented in a

letter, a written letter to EU member states. Orban has has gone public with all of this, so

we know about it. And she doesn't mention option number four, which is what Orban talks about,

which is for EU member states to say no to all three of the options,

right? Why should I give money to Ukraine? Why should I go into debt and guarantee a loan?

And why should I be on the hook for stealing Russia's frozen assets? I mean, that's another

option that obviously Ursula doesn't want to talk about. But all of this is about keeping

Ukraine afloat for what she believes

is going to be enough money for the next two years. We're talking about $130 to $150 billion.

So your thoughts on this.

It is, it really actually is becoming very obsessional.

Now, what Osir is saying is that unless Ukraine is given this money, 140 billion euros,

soon before February, Ukraine is going to go bust.

That it's running out of money fast.

...