meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast

Episode 90, Arthur Schopenhauer (Part V - Further Analysis and Discussion)

The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast

Jack Symes | Andrew Horton, Oliver Marley, and Rose de Castellane

Education, Philosophy, Society & Culture, Courses

4.8612 Ratings

🗓️ 31 January 2021

⏱️ 48 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Introduction

I am Ixion, strapped to the burning wheel of fire in the underworld that is my life. A bleak assessment to be sure, but I put it to you that it is the truth. For what is life if not an ever-swinging pendulum of pain and boredom, kept in motion by the insatiable will? I constantly strive for the things that I want, but what I want is never enough; long-term satisfaction is tedium elegantly veiled. This alone is a cruel trick to the individual, but in a world of many, it is the ultimate tragedy.

The wills of the multitude cannot avoid the inevitable conflict, as one will's ends treats another as its means. The tiger feasts on the wild dog, who feasts on the baby turtle, all to propagate life so that future generations can play out this tragic scene ad infinitum. In human life - save rare moments of true compassion - we are little better. Yet, there is a hint of salvation. 

What if we all realised that, at our core, we are the same will? What if we could make the wheel of Ixion stand still, if only for a moment? Would it be possible to see beauty? Would it be possible to see to fellow sufferers rather than fellow egos? I suspect it might, but I am afraid that I, and many others, are easily fooled. 'The Will' will do as it pleases, and not what pleases us.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Pan

0:02.0

PAN

0:04.0

Psygast

0:06.0

P Part 5. Further analyses and discussion.

0:23.7

Welcome to the final installment of the show.

0:26.6

We've unpacked all the Schopenhauer's ideas.

0:28.9

If you haven't been through the series already, please go back and listen to them.

0:33.7

This is when we give our own analysis some extra themes which we didn't get

0:37.8

chance to speak about because they didn't fit nicely into the other discussions. And some of them just aren't nice things at all. But we can't just not talk about them, can we? There's a big elephant in the room, Olly, and it's called misogyny. Yes. I think the first thing I'm going to say I think we've done real justice to Schopenhauer.

0:35.4

You know, at the Perthensikast, we try to present a philosopher in their best sense, right? Yes. I think the first thing I'm going to say is I think we've done real justice to Schopenhauer.

0:54.5

You know, at the Perns Psychast, we try to present a philosopher in their best sense, right? We want them at their ultimate best, the best arguments, the best metaphysics, the best epistemology. But sometimes there's things and you read them and you're like, okay, that doesn't sit too well. had a bit of a Twitter exchange with one of our esteemed patrons, Justin Scurry, who is a professor.

0:55.5

He teaches philosophy. Okay, that doesn't sit too well. Had a bit of a Twitter exchange with one of our esteemed patrons, Justin Scurry, who is a professor.

1:13.9

He teaches philosophy, and he says that he teaches Schopenhauer, and one of the books he gives his students to read is essays and aphorisms, which if you can remember all the way back in episode one, is a collection of short aphorisms and stories and some dialogues from his final book which he published

1:28.4

very late in his career that was a big popular one that got lots of attention.

1:31.9

One of his most notorious and controversial parts of that book is called On Women.

1:36.1

And we've made subtle references throughout the different episodes that Schopenhauer

1:39.3

had a complicated relationship with women, to put it lightly.

1:42.6

So I'm going to start off and try and give him the benefit of the doubt and say some of the complimentary things he says about women in this essay. So number one, he says that women become rational earlier in their development than men do. So he says that for women it's 18 and for men it's 28. Also, I think that's quite funny that your things meant don't become reasonable until they're 28, but okay, that's fair enough. Number two, women are more matter of fact.

2:05.1

Yeah, that's not a compliment when it comes down to those. They're obsessed with the mundane things,

2:09.5

not the important. Number three, women are more cheerful than men and can detect lies better.

2:14.9

Yeah, again, let's see where you're going here. And finally, the last one, women are more compassionate, showing loving kindness and symphony for the unfortunate much more than men do. So he doesn't say just horrible things about women. He says some nice things too, but I'm going to read you a quote now, which is from... But those are all horrible that we'll talk about. I'm not saying they're good things.

2:34.4

I'm just saying they're not as bad as what's going to come.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jack Symes | Andrew Horton, Oliver Marley, and Rose de Castellane, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Jack Symes | Andrew Horton, Oliver Marley, and Rose de Castellane and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.