meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
STEM-Talk

Episode 77: John Ioannidis discusses why most published research findings are false

STEM-Talk

Dawn Kernagis and Ken Ford

Nutrition, Alternative Health, Science, Health & Fitness, Natural Sciences

4.7706 Ratings

🗓️ 20 November 2018

⏱️ 85 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Our guest today is Dr. John Ioannidis, a Stanford professor who has been described by “BMJ” as “the scourge of sloppy science.” Atlantic magazine has gone so far as to refer to him as one of the world’s most influential scientists. John is renowned for his 2005 paper, “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,” which has been viewed more than 2.5 million times and is the most citied article in the history of the journal PLoS Medicine. He has authored nearly a thousand academic papers and has served on the editorial board of 30 top-tier journals. At Stanford, John is a professor of medicine, of health research and policy, and of biomedical data science in the school of medicine as well as a professor of statistics in the school of humanities and sciences. He is the co-director of the university’s Meta-Research Innovation Center and the former director of the Stanford Prevention Research Center. In today’s wide-ranging interview, John talks about: [00:07:43] What led him to begin questioning the reliability of medical research during his residency at Harvard. [00:12:03] His 2005 paper, “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” [00:26:27] How a major issue facing science is a lack of replication. [00:30:51] Which studies are worse, nutritional studies or drug studies. [00:38:25] If it’s possible to remove sampling biases like the healthy user bias. [00:46:50] The need for scientists to disclose their personal dietary biases as well as their personal diets when publishing research findings. [00:52:40] His recent paper, “Evidence Based Medicine Has Been Hijacked,” which argues that vested interests have transformed clinical medicine into something that resembles finance-based medicine. [00:55:36] The impact that funding pressure is having on the veracity of research being done today.   [01:08:42] The need for future research to be designed by scientists without vested interests. [01:14:58] The ways John would fix the system if he had magic wand. [01:18:42] And as a bonus, John reads an excerpt from his latest book.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to STEM Talk.

0:01.0

Stem Talk.

0:02.0

Stem Talk, STEM Talk,

0:03.0

STEM Talk,

0:04.0

STEM Talk, where we introduce you to fascinating people who passionately inhabit the scientific and technical frontiers of our society.

0:14.0

Hi, I'm your host, Don Kornagas, and joining me to introduce today's podcast as a man behind the curtain,

0:19.0

Dr. Ken Ford, IHMC's director and chairman of the

0:21.6

double secret selection committee that selects all the guests who appear on STEM talk.

0:24.6

Hi, Dawn, great to be here.

0:25.6

Our guest today has been described as one of the world's most influential scientists.

0:29.6

Dr. John E. E. A. U.Nides is a Stanford professor and meta researcher who has become one of the world's foremost experts on the credibility, or lack of it, of medical

0:37.7

research. John has authored nearly a thousand academic papers and has served on the editorial

0:42.1

board of 30 top-tiered journals. His 2005 paper, why most published research findings are false,

0:48.0

has been viewed more than two and a half million times and is the most cited article in the

0:51.8

history of the journal of Ploss Medicine. John has

0:54.4

actually gone on record to say that most of the published medical information that doctors rely on

0:58.6

is flawed. Amazing. But before we get to today's interview with John, we have some housekeeping to

1:05.3

take care of. First, we really appreciate all of you who have subscribed to STEM Talk, and we are

1:10.3

especially appreciative of all the wonderful five-star reviews positively piling up.

1:16.2

And as we announced in several earlier episodes, the Double Secret Selection Committee has been continually and carefully reviewing iTunes, Google, Stitcher, and other podcast apps for the wittiest, most lavishly praise-filled reviews to read on STEM Talk.

1:28.9

As always, if you hear your review read on STEM Talk, just contact us at STEMTalk at IHMC.US to claim your

1:35.0

official STEM Talk t-shirt. Today, our winning review was posted by someone who goes by the moniker,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Dawn Kernagis and Ken Ford, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Dawn Kernagis and Ken Ford and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.