William Salima

Strong in the back

We're showing you to do it

in a time.

He's out of God again.

It's another con score for the onus.

Arsenal lose at home to West Ham.

As unfortunately, it turns out we needed 33 shots.

This is the Arsenal Vision Postmatch podcast.

My name is Alex Fethig, Black Man, Twitter, Yankee Gunner.

I assure you, the next three shots we would have taken would have gone in.

We were due, as they say.

And so if we had not had 30 shots, but in fact, 33 shots, we would have won 3-2.

Alas, just the 30 shots and the no goals, according to Scott's

data, we were more likely statistically to score five than to score zero, read somewhere that we had the

same expected goals against West Ham that we had against Sheffield United. And in that game,

we did indeed score five. There's the question, however, though, of the quality of the chances,

where they're coming from, how the tempo of our attack, are we getting into the right positions?

I think it is time to ask some difficult questions about whether something's broken. Is something

broken in the way we attack? Or is something broken with the players we have an attack? Or is it form? Is it just form? And as fans,

we are so bad at zooming out because we are so emotionally invested in what's happening game

to game. And we tend to zoom so close in that we think the thing that just happened is the

...