meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast

Episode 74: The Time Machine

The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast

National Review

News, Politics, Music, Arts, Books, Music History

51000 Ratings

🗓️ 26 November 2024

⏱️ 56 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On episode 74 of The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast, Charles invites Luther Abel, Dan McLaughlin, and Mark Wright to discuss time travel. Among the topics discussed are how far one would have to go back in time before one's knowledge was useless; how many modern soldiers it would take to beat various historical armies; whether one would prefer to have been in the first wave on D-Day or in the infantry at Waterloo; what four items one would take into the past; and which era one would return to if forced.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to a Thanksgiving special episode of the Charles C.W. Cook podcast, episode

0:19.1

that has absolutely nothing to do with Thanksgiving, at least not directly. I suppose by the

0:26.3

end of it, we may all be wildly thankful that we were born in the last 100 years rather than before

0:33.7

that. But instead of talking about Thanksgiving, or even what we are grateful for,

0:40.0

I wanted to talk today about time travel. So I have with me, Dan McLaughlin, Luther Abel,

0:48.3

and Mark Wright, all of National Review, and in the same spirit as we interrogated what would happen if one were the last

0:57.7

man on earth, we're going to think about what would happen if you went back in time. And the first

1:05.3

question that I want to pose, and I will start here with Dan, is how far back in time do you think you would have to

1:14.6

go back before your knowledge, your modern knowledge, knowledge that you have accrued since

1:20.1

your own birth and your own time would become useless, and you would essentially be no better

1:26.8

advantaged than anyone else around you.

1:30.4

I mean, the knowledge I have today is barely useful as it is.

1:36.1

You know, I mean, my technical knowledge is extremely limited.

1:41.1

So what I know today is law, politics, and history. I mean, I would give you my

1:47.1

actual, professionally as a lawyer, I think I would be largely completely useless if you put me

1:53.6

back before about the 1930s when there's a dramatic overhaul in federal and state civil procedure and federal state relations in the law

2:03.4

and a whole lot of other things that would make it difficult even to practice law in a...

2:09.5

No, but it would still be useful, right? I mean, if you were parachuted into, say, 17th century England,

2:21.5

obviously there would be facts that you didn't know, but that legal training would still be useful as a framework. The skills you've developed would still be useful.

2:26.6

I think the methods of thinking would be useful. That's going to be useful in any period of time,

2:32.3

except for the fact that, you know, the odds are if you parachuted me into 17th century England, I'd probably just be farming dirt and not making much use of being trained as a lawyer.

2:43.3

But in all seriousness, I mean, you know, the law is pretty specialized.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from National Review, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of National Review and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.