meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Editors

Episode 680: Dissecting the Interview

The Editors

National Review

Politics, Charles C. W. Cooke, Conservatism, Conservative, Policy, Government, News, Jim Geraghty, Rich Lowry, Michael Brendan Dougherty, Current Events, Noah Rothman, Madeleine Kearns, Society & Culture, Public Policy, National Review

4.44.6K Ratings

🗓️ 30 August 2024

⏱️ 52 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today on The Editors, Rich, Charlie, Phil, and MBD discuss Kamala’s CNN interview, Zuckerberg’s letter, and the state of the 2024 presidential race.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

and Paris sits down with Dana Bash. Zuckerberg writes a letter and just where does

0:20.5

this race stand we'll discuss all this more on this edition of the editors.

0:24.6

I'm next Lowry and I'm joined as always or at least some of the time by the right, Honorable Charles

0:27.8

C. W. Cook, Philip, Phil Klein, and notorious M.B.B.D.

0:33.0

Michael Brendan Doherty, you are of course listening to a National View podcast.

0:36.7

Our sponsors this episode are The Bolton from the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the Benson

0:40.9

Center. More about both of them in due course.

0:43.0

If for some reason you're not already following us on a streaming service, by the way,

0:46.0

you can find us everywhere from Spotify to Apple Podcast.

0:48.0

If you like what you hear here, please consider giving us a glowing five-star review wherever you listen to your

0:53.8

podcast if you don't like what you hear here please forget I said anything so

0:59.7

MBD we finally got an interview out of Kamala Harris, a joint interview with Tim

1:07.4

Waltz. They both sat down at a cafe, an empty cafe with Dana Bash of CNN.

1:15.1

I have to say from their perspective,

1:17.3

this is probably a success.

1:20.1

There wasn't a massive obvious gaff for any ordinary viewer or major negative

1:26.4

storylines developed and they chose wisely with the interviewer. She

1:31.5

asked a couple questions that you would expect if you're

1:35.1

pressing such a ticket but but didn't really follow up was not adversarial in

1:41.1

any real sense and even though Harris I think to the practice

1:45.8

discerning observer seemed extremely brittle and nervous when

1:50.8

challenged and not the least bit persuasive when challenged it was was okay.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from National Review, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of National Review and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.