I am a career CIA operations officer, and as you mentioned, I was on joint duty assignment at the Office of Director National Intelligence, Directors Initiatives Group, or the DIG, between March 2025 and April 2026.

I was responsible for leading the DIG's investigation into COVID origins, anomalous health incidents, and unidentified anomalous phenomena.

I'm here today to discuss the COVID cover-up, the national security implications associated with the Diggs investigative findings, and CIA refusal to comply with lawful oversight, as well as how we remedy these problems.

Intelligence community leaders and senior analysts downplayed the possibility that the COVID pandemic originated as a result of a lab incident.

Motives are difficult to define, given the scope of the digs review. Intentional or not, the ICs

actions resulted in cover-up, wasted resources, and a failure to properly inform policymakers.

Public health policy would have been very different.

Had the American public been made aware that a virus from a lab in China was going to serve as the foundation for an emergency use authorization MRNA products,

being mandated by the former administration.

Dr. Fauci's role in the cover-up was intentional.

Dr. Fauci influenced the analytical process and findings

by leveraging his position to ensure the IC consulted with a conflicted list of curated subject

matter experts, public health officials, and scientists. This included some of the authors of the paper,

the proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2,

and other public health experts who have been in his orbit

for the last 20 plus years.

But your conclusion is that changing

from the scientific consensus of it being from a lab

to a neutral position by the CIA was significantly

influenced by Anthony Fauci? It was significantly influenced by Anthony Fauci's injecting himself

into the IC. And to go to the second part of your question about what happened, particularly

during the 90-day study, we have documentation

...