about the harmonizing as you just mentioned burgess and james on the harmonizing with the president

on elections being fraudulent or not being fair because suddenly republicans start losing as ballots

are counted which is again how tim explains how elections work um when you harmonize with the president

on that what you do is you create the circumstances for a vast number of Americans to decide that the election is not fair because they didn't win and they're angry about it.

And then you have the conditions for what happened on January 6th.

Yeah.

Didn't they learn that lesson?

Well, you're absolutely right.

Whether they learned the lesson or not, that's hard to say.

But to Tim's point about counting, absolutely.

And Mike Johnson knows that.

Mike Johnson's comment there is a piece in a larger puzzle.

And it's an indication that these words are also combined with action.

He may talk, President Trump may talk about things that sound crazy,

but he always has somebody willing to take some action.

He may talk about trying to take over Greenland,

but there's at least an attempt, and yes, he was rebuffed.

But if you think about Mike Johnson's comment,

it is a brick in the wall,

just like Steve Bannon saying we're going to have ice at the polling places, just like Tulsi Gabbard going down to Georgia, just like all of these things that get the threats against election officials, the rhetoric about voter fraud that doesn't exist.

When you talk about nationalizing elections, especially nationalizing them on a partisan basis, we need Republicans to take over 15 states.

You're not actually trying to promote election integrity.

...