we have been inundated with either conversations or, I'm talking about like national conversations

or conversations in the news media about stories and viral media clips about Jewish feelings

about security and safety on campus and the streets and the government wherever.

Or we've been inundated about Jewish feelings of discomfort about this and by this,

I mean like, you know, the extermination of an entire nation of Palestinians by a Jewish ethno-national

apartheid state about what this means for the future of Jewish identity. And at the core of

any and all critical conversations about the impact of the last two years has been, and it still remains Jewish feelings.

And like, I get it.

Like, you know, there's so many people who reached out to me privately to kind of talk about this and, you know, about why it's important for people with a platform like Freeland to talk about

this and the way they're talking about it. I get it because I absolutely believe that for the

longest time. Like I understand the specific type of gravitas or the weight that Jewishness itself

holds in the American registrar, the American psyche. I get it, and especially

for older Americans, but there is something so fundamentally dehumanizing about how Palestinians

are barely even an active consideration in these conversations. And again, I'm not only talking about the

Friedland interview, although in the interview when you watch it, and especially the last 25, 30

minutes where they're talking about, I mean, they're talking about the genocide without even

talking about the genocide in and of itself. But Palestinians are barely mentioned.

And if they are mentioned, I think two, three

times policies are mentioned, it's a very passing consideration. And we have to reckon with the

fact, especially for those of us who see this, you know, as a genocide, who see this for what it is.

We see Israel as an apartheid state. We see it as an occupying state, as a settler colonial

country. If we see

...