Welcome to Courtside, everyone, a discussion of the post-election litigation brought by Donald Trump.

It's day 51 after the election, Christmas Eve.

And for that, we have none other than Donald Trump to think.

You might not have known this, but it's a little known fact that Hugo Chavez has been working with Joe Biden to cancel Christmas. It fell on

our savior, Donald Trump, to uncancel Christmas. And so tonight, we thank him for saving Christmas.

The litigation count stands at one out of 60 cases that Trump has won and that one case got him zero votes,

Zilch. Today we had a major decision coming out of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

This is the big Wisconsin case. Now this is the case that Trump's already lost once,

and today he lost it big time in the Court of Appeals. So it doesn't change the count

of winning one out of 60. He'd already lost this case. Now he's just lost it twice. But it is really

something that puts the final nail on the coffin for Donald Trump's litigation strategy,

as I'll talk about in a moment. And Trump basically, you know, always complains that the judges

aren't actually reaching the merits of the cases and so on. And it keeps on talking this nonsense.

Now partially, sometimes judges don't reach the merits in his cases because as lawyers are so

bad, they keep botching their filings so the judges can't get to it. But partly it's also because of

important concepts, legal concepts like standing, which we spoke about a couple of weeks ago,

the idea that you actually have to have a concrete interest in the outcome of the case, and oftentimes

he's botched that as well. The decision today is

significant, however, because it goes right into the merits of Trump's claims and demolishes them.

It said that Wisconsin, the judges today said Wisconsin acted lawfully, and the accommodations that

were made for absentee voting in COVID were permissible.

And it also said, as some other courts have, that Trump sat on his hands for far too long

...