I mean from what we've seen and what we've heard it was a it was a bullet shot

that grazed his ear and injured his ear according to the physicians who examined him, there was no other further damage.

So I think that with regard to the health related purely to the bullet itself, I's he's in the clear as far as I can see I mean it's

dangerous to make diagnoses from a distance from what I'm seeing the way he's

acting now and what his physician's reports are it seems

to have been a superficial wound to the ear and that's all. I mean Trump is

dog bites man on a grand scale right he's so in New York as an immunized as to his craziness

and derangement and dishonesty that we all kind of move on and Chris you

showed some excellent headlines from kind of state and regional and city papers.

The New York Times, the paper of record, their headline on the speech was after an

emotional beginning, Trump veers into familiar partisan attacks.

Not only does that underplay the derangement of the speech, as you've just pointed out.

But I think the word familiar is very important there.

Familiar partisan attacks.

Journalists don't like familiar, right?

They don't want familiar.

They want new and shiny and Trump's insanity and

bigotry and dishonesty is all very familiar. So we've just normalised it. We've

normalised the abnormal. We've mainstreamed his extremism and

that is a fundamental problem because you then end up gaslighting your readers and your viewers

by pretending that this speech was somehow normal. I interviewed a member of the Washington Post editorial board

earlier today who said, well, when I said it was an insane speech, a crazy speech,

...