meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Barbell Medicine Podcast

Episode #376: Cycle Syncing, Cardio Myths, and Iron Deficiency: A Barbell Medicine Review of Diary of a CEO's Viral Claims

Barbell Medicine Podcast

Barbell Medicine

Health & Fitness

4.8 • 1.2K Ratings

šŸ—“ļø 28 November 2025

ā±ļø 62 minutes

šŸ§¾ļø Download transcript

Summary

Cycle Syncing, Cardio Myths, and Iron Deficiency: A Barbell Medicine Review of Viral Claims

Episode Summary: Debunking Women's Health Claims and Setting Optimal Targets

In this in-depth episode, Dr. Jordan Feigenbaum, joined by Dr. Lauren Colenso-Semple and Dr. Austin Baraki, breaks down the viral women's health claims made on a popular podcast, separating misleading mechanistic theory from actionable, evidence-based advice.

They tackle three major topics: the idea thatĀ Cycle SyncingĀ is necessary for performance (spoiler: it's not); the confused messaging surroundingĀ HIIT and Zone 2Ā cardio (consistency is key); and a critical discussion onĀ Iron Deficiency, clarifying why standard lab cutoffs for ferritin are too low and why treating to an optimal target (greater than or equal to 50 ng/mL) is essential for managingĀ fatigueĀ andĀ optimizing exercise performanceĀ in women.


ā±ļø Episode Timestamps

  • 1:29Ā I. Cycle Syncing: The Claim and the Mechanistic Logic
  • 18:54 II. Conditioning Confusion: High Intensity, Zone 2, and Zone Definitions
  • 21:10 Polarized vs. Pyramidal Training (Context)
  • 47:08 III. Iron Deficiency: Normalizing Low Ferritin
  • 51:52 Evidence Review: Setting Accurate Ferritin Cutoffs


⭐ Get More Value: Exclusive Content and Resources

Connect with Dr. Lauren Colenso-Semple: @drlaurencs1

Want to support the show and get early, ad-free access to all episodes plus exclusive bonus content? Subscribe toĀ Barbell Medicine PlusĀ and get ad-free listening, product discounts, and more. Try it free for 30-days.

Unsure which training plan is right for you? Take the freeĀ Barbell Medicine Template QuizĀ to be matched with the ideal program for your goals and experience level.

For media, support, or general questions, please contact us at [email protected]


I. Cycle Syncing: Why Consistency Trumps Hormone Status

The Problem with Mechanistic Reductionism

The viral claim that women must systematically adjust their training volume and intensity based on fluctuating hormones (estrogen and progesterone) to optimize performance or avoid harm is based on aĀ reductionistĀ and largely unproven hypothesis. While hormone changes are real, relying solely on mechanistic data (what happens in isolated cells or textbook diagrams) is insufficient, as the complex, interactive nature of human physiology often overrides these single-factor effects.

Dr. Feigenbaum and Dr. Colenso-Semple clarify thatĀ no reliable human evidenceĀ supports the idea that cycle syncing leads to superior athletic performance or adaptation. The fundamental flaw in the advice is that it confuses a plausible mechanism with a meaningful outcome.


Harm Assessment: The Cost of Inconsistency

The primary harm in cycle syncing is that it leads toĀ missed training opportunities. Adaptation is driven by consistentĀ training loadĀ (mechanotransduction), not a temporary hormone profile. Planning to proactively reduce training intensity or volume based on an unproven hormone schedule is detrimental to long-term strength and endurance gains.

Training modifications should beĀ reactive—if a person genuinely feels symptoms of fatigue, pain, or discomfort on a given day (regardless of their cycle status), they should adjust or skip the workout. The advice to only exercise or train hard when you "feel awesome" is inconsistent with the reality of progressive training and often sets unrealistic expectations.


II. Conditioning Confusion: Context is Everything

Debunking Zone 2 and HIIT Extremism

The hosts address the confusing and contradictory advice regarding high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and Zone 2 cardio, particularly the claim that Zone 2 is "bro science" and should be avoided.

The issue lies in a lack ofĀ context. The discussion on polarized (80/20) versus pyramidal training only becomes relevant forĀ high-volume endurance athletesĀ (those training for 10+ hours per week) where managing fatigue via intensity distribution is critical.

For theĀ general population—the vast majority of people consuming the viral content—the goal is simple:Ā consistency. Adhering to the minimum physical activity guidelines (150 minutes of moderate or 75 minutes of vigorous activity per week) is the priority. For this audience, almost any combination of volume and intensity works, as long as it is challenging enough and sustainable. The complex debate over intensity distribution is entirely non-actionable for people simply trying to start or maintain an exercise habit.

The advice was non-actionable because it:

  1. Used incorrect zone definitions ("Zone 1 is sitting around").
  2. Failed to integrate high-load resistance training into the cardio recommendation.
  3. Ignored the relationship between training frequency, volume, and total training load.


III. Iron Deficiency: Treating to Optimal Physiology

Normalizing Deficiency: The Problem with Lab Cutoffs

Dr. Baraki addresses the critical issue ofĀ Iron Deficiency, emphasizing that many standard laboratory cutoffs forĀ ferritinĀ are misleadingly low. Labs often set the lower limit of "normal" (e.g., 12–15 ng/mL) based on population averages, not optimal physiology. This is problematic becauseĀ upwards of 50% of young womenĀ in these samples may have completely depleted iron stores (non-anemic iron deficiency) due to menstrual blood loss and insufficient dietary intake. By accepting these low limits, the medical system is effectivelyĀ normalizing deficiency.


Optimal Ferritin Targets and Clinical Management

The consequences of non-anemic iron deficiency include significant symptoms likeĀ fatigue, impairedĀ exercise performance, andĀ restless leg syndrome. The body strips iron from other tissues, including muscle, to prioritize red blood cell production, masking the deficiency until it reaches the end stage of anemia.

Clinical guidelines are evolving, recognizing that higher ferritin levels are necessary for optimal health:

  • General Target:Ā A ferritin target ofĀ greater than or equal to 50 ng/mLĀ is reasonable for most patients, especially those experiencing fatigue.
  • Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS):Ā A higher target ofĀ greater than or equal to 75 ng/mLĀ may be necessary to address RLS, which is strongly linked to low iron stores in the brain.
  • Treatment:Ā Management often involves oral or IV iron supplementation to treat to this optimal target, while also investigating and treating the underlying causes of blood loss or malabsorption.

The idea that we are accepting lower levels due to a "sicker population" is a misconception; in reality, cutoffs are being increased (e.g., American Gastroenterology Association: 45 ng/mL; American Society of Hematology: 50 ng/mL) as clinicians learn more about optimal physiology and the necessity of managing non-anemic iron deficiency.


IV. Conclusion: Core Takeaways

The goal of reviewing this viral content is to provide a vital filter for the public, differentiating between a simple mechanism and an outcome that truly matters to long-term health and training.


  1. Consistency is King:Ā For health, find a training program you can adhere to consistently. Do not let fear of cortisol or unprovenĀ hormone matchingĀ keep you from moving your body.
  2. Lift Weights:Ā If your goal is to get stronger and improve bone mineral density, you must lift weights.
  3. Address Fatigue:Ā Do not overlook iron deficiency; address fatigue by targeting optimalĀ ferritinĀ levels.


V. Citations



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Express VPN: https://expressvpn.com/BBM
* Check out FIGS and use my code FIGSRX for a great deal: https://wearfigs.com
* Check out Factor and use my code bbm50off for a great deal: https://www.factor75.com
* Check out Rosetta Stone and use my code TODAY for a great deal: https://www.rosettastone.com
* Check out Uncommon Goods: https://uncommongoods.com/bbm
* Check out Washington Red Raspberries: https://redrazz.org


Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/barbell-medicine-podcast/donations

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome back to the Barbell Medicine podcast. I'm Dr. Jordan Feigenbaum.

0:03.6

Recently, the Diary of a CEO podcast released a series of episodes focused on women's health that went absolutely viral.

0:09.9

We're talking about millions of views. The episodes features Dr. Stacey Sims, Dr. Von der Raid,

0:14.7

Dr. Vondar Wright, Dr. Natalie Crawford, among others. Now, usually we love seeing health topics get main stage attention,

0:20.0

but as I listened, I realized that while there were kernels of truth, a lot of the advice was based on mechanistic data, so looking at what happens in a petri dish or in a textbook diagram, rather than what actually plays out in humans in the real world.

0:33.7

The result? Recommendations that are incredibly complicated, often contradictory, and frankly, the diary of a C.E. The diary of a C.

0:40.8

I'm going to do a deep dive. Today I'm joined by Dr. Lauren Colenzo Semple and Dr. Austin Baraki. We'll also get Dr. Lorraine Baraki to weigh in and Dr. Spencer Nodolsky to weigh in as well on part two of this podcast. But in part one today, we're tackling three major topics,

0:56.5

the idea that you need to, quote, sync your training to your menstrual cycle, the very confusing

1:01.2

claims made around conditioning, zone two cardio, and resistance training, and we're going to

1:05.2

talk about anemia. Let's get into it. First up, let's talk about cycle sinking. The claim here

1:10.8

is that because hormones like estrogen and progesterone fluctuate, you need

1:14.2

to fundamentally change how you train week to week, how you organize your training, etc.,

1:18.3

in order to optimize performance and to avoid harm.

1:21.6

Here's a clip from the episode explaining the logic.

1:23.6

Should women exercise? logic.

1:33.1

Should women exercise differently across the menstrual cycle?

1:38.6

So this is the nuance, and this is something if you'd ask me maybe five years ago, I would have said, sure, from a molecular level, we see that there are certain things that happen

1:42.3

with estrogen being in isolation

1:46.3

for the most part, and then when you have estrogen progester, and we see their metabolic shifts,

1:50.2

we see their temperature shifts. But the caveat is we don't know if a woman ovulates or not.

1:56.0

And I'm sure that Natalie can give some stats about the an ovulatory incidences in most women.

2:02.7

If we were to understand and know when an woman ovulates, in addition to how she feels across

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 6 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Barbell Medicine, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Barbell Medicine and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright Ā© Tapesearch 2025.