in the courtroom for this hearing what's been happening so far

that's right on a jacksmith is in the courtroom he was not here on Friday but he is

here today and they're arguing this morning over a rather esoteric legalistic highly technical

question that by the way has already been litigated in the Hunter Biden case which is

the question of whether the existing appropriation for the Special Counsel's office is legal under the Constitution,

in part because it dates back to the Old Independent Council Act, which expired in 1999.

So Donald Trump's lawyers are trying to argue that it's not legal and

therefore this entire case should be thrown out. It flows from their argument on

Friday where they argue that the Special Counsel's office was illegal under the appropriations

clause, a different part of the Constitution, the big picture here is that many

legal experts say these are not the kind of things that should be burning a day

and a half of hearing time before a trial judge.

These are appellate court issues, legal issues, not fact issues, but nonetheless, Judge

Aline Cannon has chosen to have a hearing on nearly every disputed matter, and that's what they're talking about today

this question of whether the technical language of the law in the

independent counsel statute applies here and whether the case should be thrown out on those grounds.

It's a real long shot.

Again, Hunter Biden's lawyers tried it and failed,

but we don't know exactly what Judge Cannon is going to do here.

This is... at what Judge Cannon is going to do here.

This is the primal scream of a dying regime.

Pray for our enemies, because we're going to medieval on these people. Here's a time I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people.

...