meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Our Fake History

Episode #33- Who Was the Prince of Humbugs? (Part II)

Our Fake History

PodcastOne

History, Education, Society & Culture

4.73.7K Ratings

🗓️ 12 December 2016

⏱️ 50 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

P.T Barnum did everything he could to curate his own historical legacy. He was deeply concerned with how people would remember him after he was gone. Would he go down as a greasy hustler, or would he be celebrated as a great entertainer? Since that time historians have debated Barnum's legacy as a hoaxster and manipulator of the media. Were Barnum's "humbugs" just good fun, or was he too quick to dispense with morality in order to make a buck. Tune in and find out how fish-monkeys, a woolly horse, and the town of St. Thomas, Ontario all play a role in the story.
See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

In 1865, the American shaman P.T. Barnum had grown tired of his reputation of being the

0:13.1

nation's most notorious liar. After three decades of hoodwinking the public with hoaxes

0:19.1

both big and small, Barnum's name had become synonymous with deceit. In a way, it was

0:25.5

a classic boy who cried wolf scenario. After all, it wasn't like Barnum's reputation had come

0:31.7

unirred. But despite that, it seemed to genuinely bother Barnum that people thought that he was a

0:37.6

scam artist. He was actually a very religious man who was deeply involved in the progressive

0:43.0

universalist church. It was important to him that people thought that he was moral. So being

0:49.3

Barnum, he made a pitch. He was going to reinvent himself as a great debunker of scams and ripoffs.

0:57.0

To that end, he wrote the book elaborately titled The Humbugs of the World, an account of

1:03.3

humbugs, delusions, impositions, quackeries, deceits, and deceivers generally in all ages. His

1:11.0

thesis was essentially that there's a difference between harmless humbug and full-on scam. The important

1:18.4

ingredient for Barnum was the feeling of being ripped off. If someone tricks you, takes your money,

1:24.8

and you get nothing in return, then that's a moral. But if someone tricks you into paying for

1:30.6

something that turns out to be pretty cool, then it's all good. Barnum lays out his distinction

1:37.1

using a few colorful descriptions. Quote, a respectable looking man sits beside you in an omnibus

1:44.1

or rail car. He converses fluently and is evidently a man of intelligence and reading. He attracts

1:50.7

your attention by his fair pretenses. Arriving at your journey's end, you miss your watch and your

1:57.0

pocketbook. Your fellow passenger proves to be the thief. Everyone calls him a pickpocket,

2:03.6

and notwithstanding his fair pretenses, no one in the community calls him a humbug.

2:10.2

End quote, a few paragraphs later Barnum really spells it out, writing quote,

2:16.6

two physicians reside on one of our fashionable avenues. They were both educated in the best

2:22.3

medical colleges. Each had passed an examination, received a diploma, and had been dubbed MD.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from PodcastOne, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of PodcastOne and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.