When the Tudors looked backwards, they did not see a blank stretch of time. They did not see a dusty, disconnected series of dates or a dry chronicle of dead men.

Instead, they saw themselves standing late in the story, the heirs to a grand, ancient, and often terrifying legacy.

Tudor writers, historians, and thinkers returned again and again to the same uneasy idea

that the greatest ages of the world had already passed.

There was a pervasive sense that the world was in its twilight.

They frequently used the Latin phrase Mundus Sineski to the world was in its twilight. They frequently used the Latin phrase,

Mundus Sineskite, the world grows old. To the Tudor mind, the world was not progressing

toward a brighter future. It was physically and morally decaying. The world had once been

larger, braver, more virtuous, and better ordered.

What they had inherited was impressive, certainly, but it was diminished.

A faded copy of something so much grander.

Now, Rome hovered over everything.

It wasn't just an abstract civilization from a textbook.

It was a measuring stick.

Rome in history was close,

urgent, and painfully relevant to their daily politics. Roman emperors, Roman republics, Roman collapses. These weren't just stories. They were case studies for the English court.

England compared itself to Rome constantly and not always favorably. They lived among the ruins of

Roman Britain. They read Roman texts as if they were yesterday's newspapers. If Rome, the greatest

empire of the world had ever known, had risen, flourished, and then rotted from within through luxury and faction. What did that say

about England's future? History to the Tudor mind did not move forward in a straight line toward

progress. It moved in circles. This cyclical view of time meant that civilizations rose through

virtue, discipline, and hard work,

...