So Jonathan O'Mere back to the Wall Street Journal editorial page.

They've got an editorial saying,

meet the new speaker, same as the old speaker taken of course and we won't get fooled again

let me read this for a second because I know it brings up the question we were all asking

which is like wait a second if Kevin McCarthy had done this,

he would have been kicked out a speaker. The Wall Street Journal editorial page writes his,

pop quiz, what's the difference between the bipartisan

stopgap funding bill that passed the house Tuesday under new speaker Mike

Johnson and the September equivalent passed by former speaker Kevin McCarthy

answer nothing but the self-defeating Republican drama.

So much for the claim that their goal was electing a quote, committed conservative as speaker.

And they finish up.

The lack of rebellion this week from the Republican Rump

is welcome.

And apparently, opposing two speakers in a few weeks

was too much even for them.

But it further exposes the hollow claims the McCarthy

8 made for their October exhibitionism. And that's all it was it was sound fury and gestures signifying nothing but what

did we say an attempt to get more hits on Tik-Tock and more clicks and more

and more $25 donations from across think of you committed conserved oh he's really a committed. Oh, what?

They're consc- They're not putting up with a bull-s what's going on in Washington, D.C.

They're going to get a real conservative. And what did they do? They got a guy that passed the bill the same way

...