Welcome to JFK in The Enduring Secret.

I'm your host, Jeff Crudel. Dr. Glangies Hello everyone and welcome back to the podcast.

Today's episode is episode 203, and it's the first in a mini-series about the Secret Service and forensics surrounding the president's limousine.

And it's also a series of episodes that I've really been excited to do for some time.

Mostly, the conversation will revolve around the damage to the windshield and whether it contained a through and through bullet hole that came from the front or whether it

didn't and whether the Secret Service engaged in deception related to that evidence.

Mal say it simply and very redundantly one more time.

Another shot from the front or the side and not from the rear means that there

had to be a second shooter. And that means a shooting conspiracy. Simple as that. And that is why the

question of the windshield is a seminal question surrounding conspiracy.

And that, by the way, is why I took the tact I have with subjects such as the latest Paul Landis question, meaning that while I think the Landis topic is interesting to many,

and perhaps significant, if true, well, in my own mind, it's just another incremental event that diverts

attention, something for everyone to argue over, something that really doesn't change the

preponderance of other solid evidence out there that may have already sealed the deal

when it comes to proving that a shot from

somewhere other than from behind took place too. And the presidential limousine and its windshield

may very well be the last forensic evidence that seems to point solidly in the direction of a shot from the front.

A shot that, if it occurred, likely pierced the front windshield of the presidential limousine

and remained in a tight trajectory and then penetrated the president's neck.

Probably penetrated by a full metal jacketed bullet and causing the throat

wound in President Kennedy that Malcolm Perry and almost everyone who saw it at Parkland

characterized as an entrance wound. All of the forensic evidence is interconnected, of course,

...