I'm actually going to be on the bar stool bedding website,

seeing if she brings this up at the Galein trial,

because she did bring it up at the Weinstein one.

But basically, she was able to convince,

I believe, about 25% of participants,

which I gotta say, not that high,

that they had been lost in the mall as a child

and been found by a kindly older stranger.

This did not happen to these people,

but she was able to suggest that their parents remembered it did.

And so, you know, upon further questioning,

they also remembered this.

And some of them, I believe, were remembered details

and stuff like that.

That supposedly proves a number of things.

One is that it's possible for someone to implant false memories

on somebody, right?

That you can have somebody have a memory.

Although, I guess to me, sort of the definition of memory

here gets a little hazy,

and kind of get a little philosophical on it,

because it's not a memory, right?

...