Episode 150: How Economic Jargon and Cliches Make Cruel, Anti-Poor Policies Sound Sterile and Science-y (Part I)

Citations Needed

News, Society & Culture

4.8 • 4.1K Ratings

🗓️ 1 December 2021

⏱️ 77 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

"Supply and demand." "It's just Econ 101." "Most economists agree..." "There's always trade offs."

Over and over, media and policymakers spew the same tired recitations meant to convey the seemingly natural, immutable laws of economics. "The economy," we're told, is thriving when business owners and job creators are making record profits, and failing when investments in social programs have simply grown too high — and that's the way it is and will, and should, always be.

These terms, phrases and sentiments are part of a lexicon of economic euphemisms, cliches, and other forms of business-school speak designed to blur class lines and convince us that our economic system — entirely a result of policy choices largely designed to further enrich the wealthy at any the expense of the broader welfare — is a function of cold, hard science, with rules and principles no more pliable than those of physics or chemistry.

But why should we be expected to just accept that a news report that "the economy" is on the upswing means the average worker is doing any better, when all evidence is to the contrary? Why should our media's economic so-called "experts" come from a pool of elite economics departments beholden to corporate donors and right-wing think tanks? And why must "the economy" be defined in terms of whether the Dow is up or down, instead of whether people have food, housing, healthcare, and job security?

On this episode, part one of a two-part series, we examine the first five of our ten most popular clichés, jargon, and rhetorical thingamajigs that economists, economic reporters, and pundits use to sanitize, obscure, and provide a thin gloss of Science-ism to what is little more than power-flattering, cruel, racist, austerity ideology.

Our guest is writer Hadas Thier.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	This is Citations Needed with Nemeshirazi and Adam Johnson.
0:09.0	Welcome to Citations Needed, a podcast on the media, power, PR, and the history of Bullshit.
0:14.9	I am Nemeshirazi.
0:15.9	I'm Adam Johnson.
0:17.3	You can follow the show on Twitter at CitationsPod, Facebook, Citations Needed, and become
0:21.6	a supporter of our work through patreon.com slash Citations Needed Podcast.
0:27.1	All your support through patreon is so incredibly appreciated as we are 100% listener-funded.
0:32.8	Yes and as always you can rate and subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts.
0:36.4	If you can, please support us on patreon.com helps keep the episodes themselves free.
0:39.7	There you'll find little goodies like AMAs, little patreon-only mini episodes, newsletter,
0:45.2	and other good things for our supporters who we are very much grateful for.
0:48.3	If you can't afford it, please do.
0:53.1	Supply and demand.
0:57.2	It's just Econ 101.
0:58.2	Most economists agree.
1:00.7	There's always trade-offs.
1:03.6	Over and over again, media and policymakers spew the same tired recitations meant to convey
1:10.0	the seemingly natural, immutable laws of economics.
1:14.8	The economy we're told is thriving when business owners and job creators are making record
1:20.9	profits and failing when investments in social programs have simply grown too high.
1:28.0	And that's the way it is and will and should always be.
1:32.0	These terms phrases and sentiments are part of a lexicon of economic euphemisms.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Citations Needed, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Citations Needed and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.