Pan, pan, pan, pan, sci-I-i-i-i-cast.

Nailed it.

Let's jump back into the wonderful world of strict rigorous academic philosophy.

Part four, analyses and discussion.

It's that part of the show where we all get to have fun, criticize,

and he loses his rag over the whole religious thing,

and everyone has a laugh as well.

So we're going to look at strengths, criticisms,

the things in between, a bit of back and forth,

a bit of freestyle, philosophical ultimatum,

and a few jokes in there as well.

So I guess what are your thoughts on religious experience?

You want to start off with a strength? What's good about religious experience or William James

or anything we spoke about already? Sure. Well, I'll start off. I think if you are a person who

believes in God already and you have a religious experience, then I guess it's, there's something to be said

that the majority of people that have these experiences are very vocal of the firm beliefs

they have afterwards, whether they can explain the experience or not. They definitely,

you know, if we're using a Christian example, believe in God and are very dedicated to that

cause. You know, even if we look at St. Paul, it's not like he was just like, oh, I'm going to believe in God now. You know, he dedicated his life to the spreading of this message, and he was persecuted for it, and did suffer for it to a certain extent. His head chopped off. So I said, to his... Well, and he didn't have to do that. He could have had his religious experience and just, you know, gone whatever. I'm still going to love killing them Christians and chopping their heads off. But he didn't. You know, he obviously felt something that whether or not we could argue that was epilepsy or not, his dedication is undeniable. So he did some good. Can I play devil's advocate? One if he had a religious experience and it told him that he should extra

if he thought Jesus said, keep it up, go on, up the ante a little bit.

Is that still a good?

I didn't say the British experience was good.

...