Episode 114, 'Changing Minds' with Robin McKenna (Part I - Communicating Science)
The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast
Jack Symes | Andrew Horton, Oliver Marley, and Rose de Castellane
4.8 • 612 Ratings
🗓️ 1 January 2023
⏱️ 50 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
'630 million threatened by rising seas!'; 'Study blames climate change for 37% of worldwide heat deaths!'; 'Fossil fuels must stay underground!'
Despite the headlines and 97% of climate scientists agreeing that human activity is one of the major causes of climate change, just seven in ten Americans believe that climate change is real and only six in ten consider human activity to be a leading cause. As a survey of beliefs, these statistics are concerning. The bigger problem, however, is that they aren't held in a vacuum, but are formed within and contribute to the functioning of democratic societies.
If we want a genuinely democratic state, how can we establish public policies – informed by our very best science – if a sizable minority of people reject the science? What can be done, descriptively and ethically, to change the minds of those who hold (what experts might consider) unreasonable beliefs?
According to Robin McKenna, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Liverpool, these questions demonstrate the role and importance of contemporary epistemology. Drawing from the latest empirical research on how we form beliefs and how and why we change our minds, McKenna argues that we can improve our epistemic situations by creating environments in which we are more likely to form beliefs that align with the science.
To bring about a better world, people must recognise that their beliefs aren't formed in an ideal and impartial state. To protect democracy and the natural world, says McKenna, we must combat misinformation and political bias through ethical and effective marketing.
Contents
Part I. Communicating Science
Part II. Further Analysis and Discussion
Links
Robin McKenna, Persuasion and Intellectual Autonomy (chapter).
Robin McKenna, Persuasion and Epistemic Paternalism (paper).
This episode is produced in partnership with the Philosophy and the Future project at the University of Liverpool. For more information about philosophy at Liverpool, head over to www.liverpool.ac.uk/philosophy.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | 630 million threatened by rising seas. Study blames climate change for 37% of worldwide heat deaths. |
| 0:16.0 | Fossil fuels must stay underground. Despite the headlines, and 97% of climate scientists agreeing that |
| 0:22.6 | human activity is one of the major causes of climate change, just seven in ten Americans believe |
| 0:27.7 | that climate change is real, and only six in ten consider human activity to be a leading cause. |
| 0:33.4 | As a survey of beliefs, these statistics are concerning. The bigger problem, however, is that they aren't held in a vacuum, |
| 0:39.9 | but are formed within and contribute to the functioning of democratic societies. |
| 0:45.0 | If we want a genuinely democratic state, how can we establish public policies |
| 0:49.8 | informed by our very best science if a sizable minority of people reject the science, |
| 0:55.0 | what can be done, descriptively and ethically, to change the minds of those who hold what experts |
| 1:01.0 | might consider unreasonable beliefs. According to Robin McKenna, lecturer in philosophy at the University |
| 1:07.0 | of Liverpool, these questions demonstrate the role and importance of contemporary epistemology. |
| 1:12.1 | Drawing from the latest empirical research on how we form beliefs and how and why we change our |
| 1:17.2 | minds, McKenna argues that we can improve our epistemic situations by creating environments |
| 1:22.9 | in which we are more likely to form beliefs that align with the science. To bring about a better world, people must recognize that the beliefs aren't formed in an |
| 1:31.1 | ideal and an impartial state. |
| 1:33.3 | To protect democracy and the natural world, says McKenna, we must combat misinformation and |
| 1:38.3 | political bias through ethical and effective marketing. |
| 2:18.3 | Hello and welcome to episode 114 of the Panpsychast, hindering your epistemic capacities. I'm Jack Symes. I'm joined once again by the ideal epistemic agent, that is Rose de Castellan. Hello. And the master messenger, that is Dr. Robin McKenna. Hi. Welcome to the show, Robin. It's a pleasure to have you with us. Great to be here. That was a great intro, Jack. Can you write blurbs for my books please? That would be great. That was absolutely perfect. |
| 2:23.3 | Before we jump into it, in addition to all of our patrons, we'd like to say a big thank you to the University of Liverpool's Philosophy and the Future Project for making this episode possible. |
| 2:33.6 | This is the four for five collaborative episodes for the University of Liverpool's |
| 2:37.4 | Philosophy and the Future Project, exploring the ethical, political, social, metaphysical |
| 2:42.6 | and spiritual implications of climate change, technological and scientific developments, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jack Symes | Andrew Horton, Oliver Marley, and Rose de Castellane, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Jack Symes | Andrew Horton, Oliver Marley, and Rose de Castellane and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

