The New York Times now admits that the Hunter Biden laptop is real.

The Washington Post admits that the Hunter Biden laptop is real.

Lots and lots of establishment media are admitting that it's real,

which means that hunters meticulously recorded crimes are real,

which means that the crooked deals with enemy governments are real,

which means that in some of those crooked deals with the enemy governments,

the 10% being held for the big guy, Joe Biden, is almost certainly real,

which is, to borrow a phrase from Joe Biden, a big,

effing deal. But some people in the liberal establishment media still don't want to admit it.

Thank you for doing that. I was really appreciated. I'm Darren Oshmit.

I'm a freshman at the University of Chicago. My question is for Miss Applebaum.

So in 2020, you wrote, those who live outside the Fox News bubble, do not, of course,

need to learn any of the stuff about Hunter Biden, referring to his laptop, of course.

A poll later after that found that if voters knew about the content of the laptop,

16% of Joe Biden voters would have acted differently.

Now, of course, we know a few weeks ago, the New York Times confirmed that the content is real.

Do you think the media acted inappropriately when they instantly dismissed

Hunter Biden's laptop as Russian disinformation?

And what can we learn from that? And ensuring that what we label as this information is truly

this information and not reality? My problem with Hunter Biden's laptop is I think

totally irrelevant. I mean, it's not whether it's disinformation or, I mean, I don't think the

Hunter Biden's business relationships have anything to do with who should be present in the United

...