meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Matt Walsh Show

Ep. 447 - The Ethical Dilemma Of The China Virus Response

The Matt Walsh Show

The Matt Walsh Show

News, News Commentary

4.626.2K Ratings

🗓️ 18 March 2020

⏱️ 49 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today on the show, I have a question that deals with the ethical issues tied up in the response to the China Virus. Lots of people think the response is overblown and will do more harm than good. They might be right. Which is why I hope this question might help clarify things. Also, Five Headlines, including some expert medical advice from the esteemed scholar and thinker Vanessa Hudgens. And the Philadelphia police department has officially canceled itself. Check out The Cold War: What We Saw, a new podcast written and presented by Bill Whittle at https://www.dailywire.com/coldwar. In Part 1 we peel back the layers of mystery cloaking the Terror state run by the Kremlin, and watch as America takes its first small steps onto the stage of world leadership. If you like The Matt Walsh Show, become a member TODAY with promo code: WALSH and enjoy the exclusive benefits for 10% off at https://www.dailywire.com/Walsh Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This episode is brought to you by Slack. With Slack, you can bring all your people and

0:05.9

tools together in one place. It's your digital HQ where you can increase productivity,

0:11.1

enable flexibility and automate workflows. Plus, Slack is full of game-changing features

0:16.7

like huddles for quick check-ins or Slack Connect, which helps you connect with partners

0:20.9

inside and outside of your company. Slack, where the future works. Get started at

0:26.9

Slack.com slash DHQ.

0:56.9

I'm going to ask a question. It's a real question. What I mean by that is it's not something

1:22.1

that's meant to be smarmy or that I'm just asking rhetorically to prove a point. It's

1:28.3

not a bad faith question. I really want to hear the answer because I want to have this

1:32.7

conversation. I don't know the answer myself. When I say I'm asking a question, I mean

1:38.2

that in the most direct and literal sense of the phrase. It's a question. I pose this

1:44.2

primarily to those who are on the, this is all a massive overreaction side of the debate.

1:51.6

It's this. How many deaths would be enough? What, what death toll would you need to see

2:00.7

before you would agree that drastic economy damaging possibly economy ruining measures should

2:08.2

be taken? And whatever that number is, if you have a number or, and if you like, I don't

2:13.9

think you would have an exact precise number of mine. But whatever that ballpark estimate

2:17.7

is, why, why that and not something else? Why do you draw the line there and not somewhere

2:25.1

else? So again, this is a sincere question. I really want to hear the answer. And actually

2:29.5

the question is more complicated than that because if you say that you would need the virus

2:34.3

to kill say a million Americans in order to justify this kind of response. If your position

2:40.1

is, look, I mean, this response is going to, might, might send us into a great depression.

2:44.2

This is something that we've never, this country has never done before anything like this

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Matt Walsh Show, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Matt Walsh Show and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.