This is an I-Heart podcast.

This season on Blood Trails, each story begins with a hunter stepping into the wild, but not all of them come back.

I'm Jordan Sillers, a journalist with over a decade of experience investigating stories about hunting, fishing, guns, and crime.

Join me as we track the truth through tangled cover and cold case files,

where every trail tells a story, and every story leaves its own trail of blood.

Blood trails. Listen now on Spotify.

Music From Meat-Eater's World News Headquarters in Bozeman, Montana, this is Cow's Week in Review with Ryan Cal-A.

Here's Cal.

I'm no fan of artificial intelligence, mostly because of all the water and energy it needs

to operate, which is substantial. It's already an issue. It will become a bigger issue. Pay attention.

But now we have another reason to be skeptical of the

technology that will supposedly change the world as we know it. Several states are reporting

that hunters are getting in trouble for relying on AI-powered answers to questions about

hunting regs. Up in Idaho, a duck hunter got in trouble because an AI bot told him the season started a day earlier than it actually did.

The wardens found that the search gave him an answer that pulled information from a failed proposal,

not the agency's final decision or its regulations book.

Wyoming Game and Fish also told local media that they're concerned about hunters relying too heavily on

Google or chat GPT before going out into the field. An agency spokesperson told the Cowboy State Daily

that they've noticed AI generating incorrect answers about fish and game regulations, and they

encourage hunters to consult the official rulebook or just call and ask. I know I'm speaking to the

choir here, but I thought this PSA might be useful. Also, if you've ever had trouble figuring out

how to hunt or fish without breaking the law, if it feels wrong, it probably is. Supercomputers

...