meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Ep. 373: Michael Walzer on Just Wars (Part Two)

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Mark Linsenmayer

Philosophy, Society & Culture

4.62.3K Ratings

🗓️ 18 August 2025

⏱️ 61 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Continuing on on Just and Unjust Wars (1977), ch. 5-6. When might it be morally permissible to strike first? When is it permissible (or obligatory?) to intervene in another country's internal affairs militarily? We discuss Walzer's historical examples and apply his theories to current wars.

Get more at partiallyexaminedlife.com. Visit partiallyexaminedlife.com/support to get ad-free episodes and tons of bonus discussion.

Sponsors: Visit functionhealth.com/PEL to get the data you need to take action for your health. Get a $1/month e-commerce trial at shopify.com/pel.

Enrollment is now open for Mark's online political philosophy course. See partiallyexaminedlife.com/class.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You're listening to the partially examined life, episode 373, part two.

0:12.4

We've been talking about Michael Walzer's just and unjust wars.

0:17.0

And we had pretty thoroughly talked about chapter four.

0:19.9

Let's go to chapter five, anticipations.

0:23.6

We'll start us off with the idea which is already there in the legalist paradigm, which is that states can

0:30.4

defend themselves against imminent violence. And then he's going to say, well, what do you mean by

0:36.7

imminent?

0:38.3

Right?

0:43.3

So we got into this a little bit already, but is it just about responding at the last minute?

0:52.4

In real life, that's not actually very useful because war can seem unavoidable for protracted periods of time.

0:54.8

So the word imminent is too restrictive,

0:56.1

and then he's going to say,

0:58.0

let's look at this whole spectrum of,

1:00.7

from imminent responding at the last minute,

1:02.7

to the farthest point on the spectrum from, you know,

1:04.6

in anticipation of war.

1:06.0

And let's see where we ought to draw the line.

1:09.6

Yeah, he does not believe in this, again, 18th, 19th century idea.

1:15.0

Well, he thinks it's still very important today. The balance of power, which seems to be, like,

1:19.8

if you want to give a reason why Russia attacked Ukraine, which I've heard, Walls are talking just

1:24.8

two years ago on a podcast and saying it's just so easy to condemn

1:29.2

Russia based on this book.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Mark Linsenmayer, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Mark Linsenmayer and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.