Richard Dawkins is no friend to conservatives. The atheist author spent much of his life deriding Judaism and Christianity.

He once said that an atheist is, quote, just somebody who feels about Yahweh the way any decent Christian feels about Thor or Ball or the Golden Calf.

Dawkins says that even moderate religious people, quote, make the world safe for extremists.

He's fired to the left on politics. He's pro-abortion, a supporter of Labor Party, and Liberal Democratic Party in Britain. But he is also smart enough to recognize that radical Islam is a greater threat to human life than Christianity or Judaism. Dawkins explains, quote, I have criticized the appalling misogyny and homophobia of Islam. I have criticized the murdering of apostates for no crime other than their disbelief. Muslims themselves are the prime victims of the oppressive cruelties of Islamism. Such language, of course, makes him a pariah among leftists. This week, Dawkins was scheduled to speak at an event with K-P-F-A in Berkeley, all went swimmingly. Until leftists realized Dawkins had said some untoward things about Islam. Then they canceled the speech,

citing his quote-unquote abusive speech. They explained, quote, we had booked this event based

entirely on his excellent new book on science when we didn't know he had offended and hurt

in his tweets and other comments on Islam. So many people, KPFA does not endorse hurtful speech.

This is no shock. The same left that Bard Dawkins from his Berkeley event

cheered this week, while Palestinian Arabs riot over metal detectors at the Temple Mount. Those leftists

proclaim that the true obstacle to peace in the Middle East isn't Palestinian Arab violence. It isn't

Palestinians who stabbed Israeli-Drews police officers on the Temple Mount, or Palestinians who invade

homes and slaughter old men and women, or the Palestinians and government

who cheer, honor, and financially support such behavior. Nope, the problem is the Jews. The same left

that blames metal detectors for murderous assault and Richard Dawkins for offending Islam,

makes excuses for radical Muslim and Women's March organizer Lindyarsour, who is called for apostate

Muslims to have their genitals removed, who says that Zionists cannot be feminist, and who stands up for terrorists and terrorist supporters.

So, why does the left seek to support radical Islam so ardently?

Well, because the left believes that the quickest way to destroy Western civilization is no longer class warfare, but multicultural warfare.

Simply ally with groups that hate the prevailing system and work with them to take it down. Then the left will build on the ashes of the old system. In this view, Dawkins is an opponent. How can left recruit Muslims to fight the same system if Dawkins is busy alienating them? They support the Palestinian terror regime. How can that colonialist output, the outpost, Israel, be defeated without a little blood? They applaud Sarsour. She's an ally, so that means

she must be backed. Alliance with nefarious forces calls your own morality into question. KPFA has a lot

more to answer for than Dawkins. But the left will never have to answer such questions so long as they

focus in on their common enemy, a supposedly conservative establishment that must be fought with

...