The liberal globalist order is at its brink and awakening a new conservative age.

I'm Dr. Steve Turley.

Join me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the

revitalization of conservative civilization.

This is Turley Talks.

This is at least a partial, if not a full, and we're reading this because there are several

concurrences here, but it's written by Justice Barrett, which goes against the ruling that

I just gave the guidance because she's one of the least junior justices, which she was assigned

to write this opinion. And essentially what she says, she says some say that the universal injunctions give the judiciary a powerful tool to check the executive branch.

But she says, federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the executive branch.

They resolve cases and controversies consistent with the authority Congress has given to them.

When a court concludes the executive branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court

to exceed its power, sounding very much like they are limiting these injunctions.

We know here that they have granted at least partially the stay to these preliminary injunctions,

but they say only to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue.

They say the law courts have to move expeditiously with respect to each of these plaintiffs.

So the injunctions are also stayed to the extent that they prohibit executive agencies from developing and issuing public guidance about the executive plans to implement the executive order.

If you remember, part of this executive order on birthright citizenship, the stay was that the

agencies that would be responsible for actually implementing the change with birthright citizenship,

those agencies couldn't even start making a plan.

So that part of it is lifted as well.

We do see that the dissent here comes from

...